[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (24 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques

Re: [VOTE] [x3] Release Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.2

Sorry, the repository for this is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-007/ On 10/7/10 4:57 PM, John Casey wrote: Hi, NOTE: This is the third attempt to release version 2.2. The bugfix that triggered this respin is: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-509 We solve

[VOTE] [x3] Release Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.2

Hi, NOTE: This is the third attempt to release version 2.2. The bugfix that triggered this respin is: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-509 We solved 93 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11126&version=12617 There are still a couple of issues left in J

[VOTE] Release Maven Antrun plugin version 1.6

Hi, We solved 4 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11125&version=16742 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11125&status=1 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

+1 (non-binding) everything by the book! On 10/4/10 5:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this marathon. We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: http

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] [TAKE 2] Release Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.2

I'm cancelling this due to another bug filed related to some corner case where a system property key is empty: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-509 -j On 10/6/10 11:37 AM, John Casey wrote: FWIW, Benjamin fixed an issue with the use of ${java.io.tmpdir} in Java 1.5, where non-existen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

Hi +1 (non-binding) works for me. Regards Mark Donszelmann On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

+1 Woohoo! Thanks, ~t~ On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

+1 Works like a champ, draws less than an amp - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

+1 looks fine for me though (tried with OpenWebBeans and in company projects) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 10/5/10, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > From: Dennis Lundberg > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0 > To: "Maven Developers List" > Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2010, 6:20 PM > +1 from m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

+1 On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://jira.codehaus.or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

+1 Kristian ma., 04.10.2010 kl. 14.16 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of > this marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://j