Re: svn commit: r1004461 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-antrun-plugin/src: it/task-encoding-test/ it/task-encoding-test/pom.xml main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/antrun/AntRunMojo.java

2010-10-04 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi Paul, Author: pgier Date: Mon Oct 4 22:22:30 2010 New Revision: 1004461 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004461&view=rev Log: [MANTRUN-155] Set encoding for generated Ant build. Patch from Anders Hammar with some minor changes. Added: maven/plugins/trunk/maven-antrun-plugin/sr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Tested on various projects. +1 Arnaud On Oct 4, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Ralph Goers
-0. I have the same objection to Aether that I noted when it was introduced. It is now much more difficult for me to enhance dependency resolution in Maven to include metadata beyond what the Aether api supports since Aether is not part of Maven. Ralph On Oct 4, 2010, at 5:16 AM, Benjamin Ben

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
On 4 October 2010 05:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. I seem to have a problem with a combination of Maven 2 and 3: http://mail-archives.a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Evgeny Mandrikov
+1 (non binding) Tested on all Sonar projects including parallel builds and Tycho-based. On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 21:57, Toni Menzel wrote: > +1 (non binding) OPS4J stuff builds on and works with this cool release! > > Toni > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY > wrote: > > +1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release plugin version 2.1

2010-10-04 Thread Mark Derricutt
+1 -- Pull me down under... On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 17 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11144&styleName=Html&version=12571 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/ >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Toni Menzel
+1 (non binding) OPS4J stuff builds on and works with this cool release! Toni On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > +1 > > Hervé > > Le lundi 04 octobre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware >> of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le lundi 04 octobre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of > this marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://jira.codeha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Jesse Glick
Nonbinding +1; seems to be working well embedded in NetBeans IDE development builds. Nice job. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Inflexibility of --also-make w.r.t. unusual goals

2010-10-04 Thread Jesse Glick
On 10/02/2010 07:27 AM, Brett Porter wrote: Are there plans for a more clever make mode? The 3.0 compatibility guide implies that there are, but does not give any specifics. I'm not sure what you're referring to that gave that indication? https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-compatibility

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Common Artifact Filters version 1.3

2010-10-04 Thread John Casey
Re-sending to copy the PMC list. The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): John, Olivier, Benjamin, Herve I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. On 9/28/10 6:31 PM, John Casey wrote: Hi, We solved 1 issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Common Artifact Filters version 1.3

2010-10-04 Thread John Casey
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): John, Olivier, Benjamin, Herve I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. On 9/28/10 6:31 PM, John Casey wrote: Hi, We solved 1 issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761&version=15582 The

Re: Updating the release plan for Assembly Plugin

2010-10-04 Thread John Casey
Sorry I missed this thread before... On 9/15/10 1:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi I saw that John added http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-502 with a wish for Java 1.5. This is fine, but I think we need to discuss the contents of the coming versions. Over the last year or so I've tried

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Igor Fedorenko
+1. maven 3.0 looks good on tycho. -- Regards, Igor Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this marathon. We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: http://jira.cod

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 (non-binding) > Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:33:04 +0200 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0 > From: m...@batmat.net > To: dev@maven.apache.org > > (non-binding.Sorry) > > 2010/10/4 Baptiste MATHUS > > > +1 > > > > After fixing our conf (many xml parsers in the classpath), maven 3.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
(non-binding.Sorry) 2010/10/4 Baptiste MATHUS > +1 > > After fixing our conf (many xml parsers in the classpath), maven 3.0 built > them fine, so it's not blocking at all. I'll have to internally investigate > where the difference comes from, if possible I might file the corresponding > issue on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
+1 After fixing our conf (many xml parsers in the classpath), maven 3.0 built them fine, so it's not blocking at all. I'll have to internally investigate where the difference comes from, if possible I might file the corresponding issue once analyzed. Baptiste 2010/10/4 Stephane Nicoll > +1 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Stéphane On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > > http://jir

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Paul Merlin
+1 (non-binding) /Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Dan On Monday 04 October 2010 8:16:07 am Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of > this marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://jir

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Jesse McConnell
+1 go go maven gadgets! -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 09:57, Vincent Siveton wrote: > yeah +1 > > Vincent > > 2010/10/4 Benjamin Bentmann : >> Hi, >> >> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of >> any major regression so l

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Vincent Siveton
yeah +1 Vincent 2010/10/4 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread John Casey
+1 On 10/4/10 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this marathon. We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa

Re: Release plugin snapshot dependency resolution

2010-10-04 Thread Brett Porter
On 04/10/2010, at 6:06 PM, Marcus Linke wrote: > OK accepted. But if this shouldn't be within the responsibility of the > release plugin but of the versions plugin, do you know a possibility to > hide this versions plugin goal execution from the users point of view? So > is there a way to hook in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 Stephen On 4 October 2010 15:06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > +1 > > Emmanuel > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < > benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of > > any major regression so

Re: Release plugin snapshot dependency resolution

2010-10-04 Thread Brett Porter
On 04/10/2010, at 10:36 PM, Marcus Linke wrote: > Hi brett, of course it is. So should i open a new issue for this feature > in the JIRA or will you do so? ;) It's all yours. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ --

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, Not sure it's a maven issue here. You can try changing the sax parser -Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl with a recent xerces version in your classpath (in your pom I mean) In the gwt plugin configuration use ...-Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFacto

Re: Release plugin snapshot dependency resolution

2010-10-04 Thread Marcus Linke
Hi brett, of course it is. So should i open a new issue for this feature in the JIRA or will you do so? ;) "Maven Developers List" writes: >On 04/10/2010, at 6:06 PM, Marcus Linke wrote: > >> OK accepted. But if this shouldn't be within the responsibility of the >> release plugin but of the vers

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread nicolas de loof
+1, works fine for me Nicolas 2010/10/4 Greg Akins > +1 > > Ran against all my projects successfully > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of > > any major regression so let's try

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Siarhei Dudzin
Just fyi, the change in classpah ordering actually helped me to find a conflict there. Been testing RC3 since its been out - all is good so far. Regards, Siarhei On Oct 4, 2010 3:01 PM, "Benjamin Bentmann" wrote: > Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > >> I'd like to use dependency:list to check ordering, but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > > http://jir

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Greg Akins
+1 Ran against all my projects successfully On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 Let it be free! On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http:/

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this marathon. We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=13142 There are still

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Baptiste MATHUS wrote: I'd like to use dependency:list to check ordering, but I remember (Arnaud's tweet, I'd say) reading that the dependency plugin output is not reliable yet with maven3 execution? Is it? Regardless of the Maven version, dependency:list cannot be used to check class path or

Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Julien HENRY
+1 (non-binding) I use it everyday on my dev computer. Missing functionalities are Hudson, Sonar and m2eclipse (simple) integration but I feel it will be quickly done once Maven 3 is officially released. Thanks for the good work! Julien - Message d'origine > De : Benjamin Bentmann

Re: Release plugin snapshot dependency resolution

2010-10-04 Thread Marcus Linke
OK accepted. But if this shouldn't be within the responsibility of the release plugin but of the versions plugin, do you know a possibility to hide this versions plugin goal execution from the users point of view? So is there a way to hook in the versions plugin goal execution into the release proc

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
Hi, I just tested maven3 on a project I hadn't tried before and notice a build failure that doesn't happen with mvn2.2.1. It seems to be related to XML parser problem&GWTTestCase. I suspect it might be related to classpath ordering, though I remember this order must be guaranteed since 2.0.9. I'd

[VOTE] Release Maven Release plugin version 2.1

2010-10-04 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, We solved 17 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11144&styleName=Html&version=12571 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/ Source distribution: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/org/apache/maven/re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 4 October 2010 13:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
Well, I agree that it's basically not a maven specific issue, but the thing is the build is going completely fine with 2.2.1, but not with 3.0rc3, so I'm trying to understand where the difference lies. And for the record, yes, it's a xml parser problem (oracle xmlparserv2 gets in the way). I just

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread chemit
+1 (non-binding) Works fine for our projects. Great job guys. Le Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:16:07 +0200, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not > aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing > line of this maratho

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Siarhei Dudzin
Just fyi, the change in classpah ordering actually helped me to find a conflict there. Been testing RC3 since its been out - all is good so far. Regards, Siarhei On Oct 4, 2010 3:01 PM, "Benjamin Bentmann" wrote: