I'm at JavaOne this week so I didn't see this until know. You're back
in the group now.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
> On 20 September 2010 16:43, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>> (If Brian hasn't seen this thread and done it already,) send an email
>> to the PMC list private@ and a
Being "unassigned" is a good way for saying it hasn't been reviewed.
You could, if you wanted, assign it to a "Maven Developer" once
reviewed.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Agree too.
>
> 2010/9/21 Stephen Connolly :
>> I think it is better to either: default it to To Be
Agree too.
2010/9/21 Stephen Connolly :
> I think it is better to either: default it to To Be Reviewed; or leave it
> unassigned. Giving users the ability to set the Fix version to any
> arbitrary version will just make a mockery of our bug scrubs
>
> On 20 September 2010 21:54, Brett Porter wro
I think it is better to either: default it to To Be Reviewed; or leave it
unassigned. Giving users the ability to set the Fix version to any
arbitrary version will just make a mockery of our bug scrubs
On 20 September 2010 21:54, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 20/09/2010, at 12:02 PM, Jason van Zyl
On 20/09/2010, at 12:02 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Is it possible for users to set the fix version? If it is can we change that
> so users can set no fix version and place it in the "to be reviewed" bucket.
It's not currently, but we can change it to make it possible. It tended to get
abused m
Is it possible for users to set the fix version? If it is can we change that so
users can set no fix version and place it in the "to be reviewed" bucket.
On Sep 20, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Ok, done (I didn't spam the issues list).
>
> So, there are 20 current issues in Unschedul
Ok, done (I didn't spam the issues list).
So, there are 20 current issues in Unscheduled to review.
On 20/09/2010, at 6:08 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> I'd like to suggest we move everything in ( 2.2.2, 2.2.x (to be reviewed),
>> Unscheduled ) last updated before 1
On 20 September 2010 16:43, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> (If Brian hasn't seen this thread and done it already,) send an email
> to the PMC list private@ and ask to be reinstated.
Sent, thanks.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Mark Hobson wrote:
> Oh no! You're right, Brian demoted me back in July; that'll teach me
> for getting caught up with work. Do I have to do anything special to
> get reinstated?
(If Brian hasn't seen this thread and done it already,) send an email
to the PMC
On 20/09/2010, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> ok
> my questions are:
> 1. what is the future of plexus-components-annotations?
it's used by sisu-inject-plexus - we've started to investigate
how maven plugins might look like in a JSR330 world, but
this is at the early stages so there's not much to see (ye
On 20 September 2010 15:12, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> I don't see your user id among [0] and the Maven Parent POM says your role
> is emeritus, that explains it I guess.
>
> Two months back, there was some cleanup of the groups. Maybe you fall
> through and didn't get a mail when your status was
Mark Hobson wrote:
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden)
I don't see your user id among [0] and the Maven Parent POM says your
role is emeritus, that explains it I guess.
Two months back, there was some cleanup of the groups. Maybe you
We don't really use the MPA JIRA any more. Best to get it sorted out here, and
then list it on the site (per the issue you filed).
Thanks,
Brett
On 20/09/2010, at 4:12 AM, Freddy Munoz wrote:
> Hello Again,
>
> I'm trying to fill a request in the "Maven Project Administration" JIRA
> project
On 20 September 2010 14:20, Anders Hammar wrote:
> I'm kind of thinking that Jason was right when he said that the switch to
> ldap could have caused this...
Not sure if it's related, but I couldn't add my new PGP key to KEYS [1] either:
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Server sent unex
I'm kind of thinking that Jason was right when he said that the switch to
ldap could have caused this...
/Anders
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 14:37, Mark Hobson wrote:
> On 20 September 2010 13:00, Anders Hammar wrote:
> > I'd say you don't have permission to deploy (snapshots) to
> m-checkstyle-p.
Brett Porter wrote:
I'd like to suggest we move everything in ( 2.2.2, 2.2.x (to be reviewed), Unscheduled )
last updated before 1 Sep 2010 into "Issues to be reviewed for 3.x". [...]
Any objections?
Nope
Benjamin
-
To u
On 20 September 2010 13:00, Anders Hammar wrote:
> I'd say you don't have permission to deploy (snapshots) to m-checkstyle-p.
> You need to get someone to verify this for you.
Strange, I successfully released 2.4 about a year ago, but the
infrastructure has changed somewhat since then.
Can anyon
On 20 September 2010 13:01, Martin Gainty wrote:
> did you add repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots repository
> to your list of proxied repositories in your ./.m2/settings.xml
> http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.2.1/maven-settings/settings.html
I haven't got any proxy elements in my
Hello Again,
I'm trying to fill a request in the "Maven Project Administration" JIRA project
(as stated in http://maven.apache.org/community.html), however, I'm unable to
create a ticket (I don't see the project in the "create issue" drop-down list).
Could you give me a hand with that? My Jira
I forgot to specify that I have already created a ticket in the "Maven 2
Project Web Site" project in JIRA http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGSITE-119
Thanks again,
Kind regard
> Hello Again,
>
> I'm trying to fill a request in the "Maven Project Administration" JIRA
> project (as stated in ht
Hi Mark
did you add repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots repository to
your list of proxied repositories in your ./.m2/settings.xml
http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.2.1/maven-settings/settings.html
?
Martin
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichke
I'd say you don't have permission to deploy (snapshots) to m-checkstyle-p.
You need to get someone to verify this for you.
/Anders
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:15, Mark Hobson wrote:
> On 17 September 2010 21:38, Anders Hammar wrote:
> > That's what I would do. Start with a simple setup and when
On 17 September 2010 21:38, Anders Hammar wrote:
> That's what I would do. Start with a simple setup and when that works add
> the encryption.
I still get a 403 when using no password encryption. I've also tried
using the httpclient wagon provider but to no avail:
[INFO] [deploy:deploy {executi
Thanks for the small rewrite done, Benjamin.
Cheers
2010/9/16 Jeff MAURY
> I agree with Baptiste that the explanation is ambiguous. I understand the
> same thing.
>
> Regards
> Jeff MAURY
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Benjamin Bentmann <
> benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
>
> > Baptist
24 matches
Mail list logo
