Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-01 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 (non binding) works fine with gwt-maven plugin 2010/9/2 Hervé BOUTEMY > +1 > > Hervé > > Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here > > we go! > > > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here > we go! > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-01 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Given that this is just one plugin, I give this candidate my +1. We should note this as a known issue in the release notes though. Please go ahead and fill an issue in MNG. Benjamin - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Comparing the results between beta-2 and beta-3 I see a difference in my builds for the Appassembler Maven Plugin (@mojo.codehaus.org). In beta-2 the plugin (correctly) assembles the dependencies in a flat structure in my configured "lib" directory. Whereas beta-3 puts the dependencies in my config

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 Kristian Den 30.08.2010 15:09, skrev Benjamin Bentmann: Hi, what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go! Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new