Re: [VOTE] Release Maven WAR Plugin version 2.1

2010-08-16 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 works well, quick glimpse over the diff looks ok too. LieGrue, strub - Original Message > From: Stéphane Nicoll > To: Maven Developers List > Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 7:00:51 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven WAR Plugin version 2.1 > > +1 > > S. > > On 15 Aug 2010, at 12

Re: [ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
patch applied r986189. On 16 August 2010 23:50, Stephen Connolly wrote: > On 16 August 2010 23:15, sebb wrote: >> On 16 August 2010 16:00, Stephen Connolly >> wrote: >>> Does the issue have a patch? >> >> It does now. >> >> Many thanks to Stevo Slavic. >> >>> Does the patch include integration

Re: Resolving SNAPSHOTs from Version Ranges in Maven 3

2010-08-16 Thread Mark Derricutt
I just added a new comment to MNG-4751 regarding this issue: http://bit.ly/9TaV3D Basically - a work-around solution would be to allow -SNAPSHOT resolution for artifacts that are currently part of a reactor process. -- Pull me down under... On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Benjamin Bentman

Re: [ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 16 August 2010 23:15, sebb wrote: > On 16 August 2010 16:00, Stephen Connolly > wrote: >> Does the issue have a patch? > > It does now. > > Many thanks to Stevo Slavic. > >> Does the patch include integration tests that cover positive and >> negative testing? > > AFAIK. > >> Is the patch again

Re: [ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread sebb
On 16 August 2010 16:00, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Does the issue have a patch? It does now. Many thanks to Stevo Slavic. > Does the patch include integration tests that cover positive and > negative testing? AFAIK. > Is the patch against the latest code base? AFAIK. > Is the patch formatte

Re: [ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
Does the issue have a patch? Does the patch include integration tests that cover positive and negative testing? Is the patch against the latest code base? Is the patch formatted using the Maven code style? Does the patch exclude formatting changes on lines not affected by the patch? If the ans

Re: [ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread sebb
Why has SUREFIRE-536 still not been fixed? It was originally reported against 2.4.3 On 16 August 2010 15:19, Stephen Connolly wrote: > The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of Surefire, version 2.6 > > This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the > unit tests o

Re: Update PMC board report for Surefire 2.6

2010-08-16 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Stephen Connolly wrote: Can a PMC please confirm that the Surefire 2.6 release has been added to the board report? ACK. Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: de

Update PMC board report for Surefire 2.6

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
Can a PMC please confirm that the Surefire 2.6 release has been added to the board report? Thanks, -Stephen

[ANN] Surefire 2.6 Released

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of Surefire, version 2.6 This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA creating the web inte

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven WAR Plugin version 2.1

2010-08-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2010/8/15 Dennis Lundberg : > Hi, > > We solved 7 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11150&styleName=Html&version=16372 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11150&status=1 > >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Surefire version 2.6

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Oliver Lamy, Herve Boutemy +1 (non binding): Tony Chemit, Kristian Rosenvold, Stephen Connolly, I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. -

Re: Any plans to reintroduce the uniqueVersion functionality?

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
Search the mailing archives. IIRC Brian Fox said that it was too complex to handle when they were initially rewriting the artifact resolution code... and nobody has been interested in adding back the support, but Brian said that if somebody was interested in adding support back in then (as long as

Re: Any plans to reintroduce the uniqueVersion functionality?

2010-08-16 Thread Anders Hammar
This type of questions are more appropriate for the users list. I'm including that as well. Please just respond to that mailing list. >From what I know, uniqueVersion is always true for Maven 3 and there is no planned support for non-unique versions. Other people has asked the same, but nobody has

Any plans to reintroduce the uniqueVersion functionality?

2010-08-16 Thread ni...@codefresh.com
Hi, I've noticed that the uniqueVersion attribute of the release plugin is effectively ignored for Maven 3, which is preventing me from upgrading at present. In my shop we use this plugin to upload a SNAPSHOT version of our code to Nexus, which a UNIX script then downloads to a server and installs

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven WAR Plugin version 2.1

2010-08-16 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 7 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11150&styleName=Html&version=16372 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavig

Re: Release WAR Plugin?

2010-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 On 16 August 2010 07:34, Stephane Nicoll wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Dennis Lundberg > wrote: > > > On 2010-08-12 09:26, Stephane Nicoll wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > While we're discussing the war plugin, if anyone is interested to work > on > > it > > > a bit more, it would be