+1
Vincent
Le 2010-08-09 à 14:56, Kristian Rosenvold
a écrit :
+1
Kristian
lø., 07.08.2010 kl. 13.16 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann:
Hi,
We solved 28 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1 Also worked for me on the projects I tested.
Ralph
On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> +1 works great on the projects I tested.
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 28 issues:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pr
+1 works great on the projects I tested.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 28 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/
In the discussion over the weekend, it seemed like a high value was placed
on having a beta-3 that differed from beta-2 only (or almost only) in the
Aether and Guice changes.
Given that, should a second vote get started for beta-3 ASAP, so that
there's as little other change between them as pos
I vote -1 to release the Site Plugin as it is staged.
Here are my reasons:
* The site for 3.0-beta-1 is hopelessly outdated. It's files are from
before the 2.1 version was released. This means that important pointers
about the Doxia upgrade is missing. The POM snippets has hardcoded
versions (2.0
+1
Shane
+1
Kristian
lø., 07.08.2010 kl. 13.16 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 28 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset
So a proposal release note is available here http://goo.gl/Z16v
Please folks comment and/or fix stuff.
Thanks
2010/8/9 Dennis Lundberg :
> On 2010-08-09 00:59, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>
>>> On 2010-08-08 23:30, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2010/8
On 2010-08-09 00:59, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Aug 8, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>> On 2010-08-08 23:30, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2010/8/8 Dennis Lundberg :
On 2010-08-08 20:07, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2010/8/8 Tony Chemit :
>> +1 (I'd like to work only with maven 3 an
+1
Vincent
Le 2010-08-09 à 02:20, Lukas Theussl a écrit :
+1
-Lukas
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
We solved 4 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&version=16499
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNav
+1
Vincent
Le 2010-08-09 à 02:20, Lukas Theussl a écrit :
+1
-Lukas
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
In order to have a good companion to the coming Apache Maven 3.0-
beta-2 release.
I'd like to release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3.
We solved 10 issues :
http://jira.codehaus.org/sec
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> An interesting read just popped up on twitter as I got this mail:
> http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Copyright-assignment-Once-bitten-twice-shy-1049631.html
> (points both for and against, including "I want to spend my spare time
> coding,
+1
if it's not a regression, it's not a blocker :)
On 09/08/2010, at 8:50 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-468
>
> I don't see this as being quick to fix. It's the only remaining open issue
> for 2.6, will I move it to the backlog so we can s
An interesting read just popped up on twitter as I got this mail:
http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Copyright-assignment-Once-bitten-twice-shy-1049631.html
(points both for and against, including "I want to spend my spare time coding,
not doing paperwork" :)
On 09/08/2010, at 9:53 PM, Jason
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:17 AM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> Do you plan to also use Aether for Provisio ?
Yes, Alin has already integrated Aether into our runtime assembler based on p2.
> I read at http://www.scribd.com/doc/29909925/Managing-Run-Times-With-Proviso
> that
> it uses P2 for provisioning
Do you plan to also use Aether for Provisio ?
I read at http://www.scribd.com/doc/29909925/Managing-Run-Times-With-Proviso
that
it uses P2 for provisioning, but this may be outdated
Cheers,
Nicolas
2010/8/9 Jason van Zyl
> Some more public information for those interested in Aether:
>
> http://
Some more public information for those interested in Aether:
http://www.sonatype.com/people/2010/08/aether-questions-answered-for-jax/
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
---
On Aug 8, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2010, at 12:39 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't this have the same problem with Apache based code? Doesn't the
>> Apache Contributor agreements say you assigned copyright over to Apache?
>
> No, it doesn't.
>
It is a grant
The previous behaviour was failing to catch a linkage error which gets
thrown when instantiating a class that depends on a class that is not there.
So there was no dep on junit, just the wrong exception was being caught
Fixed now (hopefully, well wait for the grid to confirm)
https://grid.sonatyp
Yes, but I'd rather commit with the fix in one go rather than go in two
fixes so that it is clearer what was changed
-Stephen
On 9 August 2010 10:21, Brett Porter wrote:
> Wasn't the failure for the POJO Test stuff? I need to take a closer look,
> but maybe there's a potential that the previous
Wasn't the failure for the POJO Test stuff? I need to take a closer look, but
maybe there's a potential that the previous behaviour was masking a bug where
the test actually required a dep on junit.
And frankly, we can probably deprecate the POJOTest stuff. I'd be extremely
surprised to see it
+1 nonbinding
runs fine on a few projects I've tested it with. Did no mvn site though...
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
> From: Benjamin Bentmann
> To: Maven Developers List
> Sent: Sat, August 7, 2010 1:16:42 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2
>
> Hi,
>
> We
+1 nonbinding
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
> From: Benjamin Bentmann
> To: Maven Developers List
> Sent: Sun, August 8, 2010 12:29:26 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven Shade Plugin 1.4
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?project
+1
2010/8/8 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&version=16499
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11540&status=1
>
> Staging repo:
+1
Emmanuel
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 28 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?res
+1
-Lukas
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
We solved 4 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&version=16499
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11540&status=1
Staging repo:
https
+1
-Lukas
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
In order to have a good companion to the coming Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2 release.
I'd like to release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3.
We solved 10 issues :
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11146&version=15554
Staging repo:
+1
Under "Issues to be reviewed for 3.x" [1] there are a couple of issues
that are closed as fixed without a 'fix for' version. can this be
cleaned up?
I also keep bumping into MNG-1378 [2]. It would be nice if this could be
addressed during the betas still (I also just noticed that it act
28 matches
Mail list logo
