Re: 3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

2010-08-08 Thread Brett Porter
On 09/08/2010, at 12:39 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Wouldn't this have the same problem with Apache based code? Doesn't the > Apache Contributor agreements say you assigned copyright over to Apache? No, it doesn't. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/

Re: 3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

2010-08-08 Thread Mark Derricutt
Wouldn't this have the same problem with Apache based code? Doesn't the Apache Contributor agreements say you assigned copyright over to Apache? As you say - out of scope for the list. I'll take my answer off-list (mmm, sounds like a talk back radio caller!). -- Pull me down under... On Mon,

Re: 3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

2010-08-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Aug 8, 2010, at 9:17 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 09/08/2010, at 10:55 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > So I refute this with an act by Kristian today which was to sign the Sonatype CLA, sign up for the mailing list, asked for access to the wiki, already has access and has

Re: svn commit: r983256 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-clean-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/clean/Cleaner.java

2010-08-08 Thread Brett Porter
On 08/08/2010, at 2:23 AM, bentm...@apache.org wrote: > Author: bentmann > Date: Sat Aug 7 16:23:31 2010 > New Revision: 983256 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983256&view=rev > Log: > [MCLEAN-45] Clean plugin should support a silent retry in case the first > attemp fails There's a

Re: 3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

2010-08-08 Thread Brett Porter
On 09/08/2010, at 10:55 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >>> >>> So I refute this with an act by Kristian today which was to sign the >>> Sonatype CLA, sign up for the mailing list, asked for access to the wiki, >>> already has access and has been working with Benjamin. You'll also notice >>> he hasn

Re: 3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

2010-08-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Aug 8, 2010, at 8:18 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 07/08/2010, at 9:47 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> >> On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:44 AM, Brett Porter wrote: >> >>> Unavoidable. We're not going to bring in everyone other dependency and any developer worth their salt can figure

Re: 3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

2010-08-08 Thread Brett Porter
On 07/08/2010, at 9:47 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:44 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > >> >>> >>> Unavoidable. We're not going to bring in everyone other dependency and any >>> developer worth their salt can figure out how to pull in sources for >>> dependent projects. Aether

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Aug 8, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > On 2010-08-08 23:30, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> 2010/8/8 Dennis Lundberg : >>> On 2010-08-08 20:07, Olivier Lamy wrote: 2010/8/8 Tony Chemit : > +1 (I'd like to work only with maven 3 and the site plugin is the last > break for it) >>

[ANN] Maven Scm 1.4 Released

2010-08-08 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Scm, version 1.4. http://maven.apache.org/scm/ Release Notes - Maven SCM - Version 1.4 ** Bug * [SCM-431] - Username and Password cause NumberFormatException in scm:hg:http URLS * [SCM-444] - Git provider does 'git push

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-08 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2010-08-08 23:30, Olivier Lamy wrote: > 2010/8/8 Dennis Lundberg : >> On 2010-08-08 20:07, Olivier Lamy wrote: >>> 2010/8/8 Tony Chemit : +1 (I'd like to work only with maven 3 and the site plugin is the last break for it) but some stuff seems not to be any longer possible w

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-08 Thread Olivier Lamy
2010/8/8 Dennis Lundberg : > On 2010-08-08 20:07, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> 2010/8/8 Tony Chemit : >>> +1 (I'd like to work only with maven 3 and the site plugin is the last >>> break for it) >>> >>> but some stuff seems not to be any longer possible with this version. >>> >>> 1) merging reporting >>

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Linkcheck Plugin version 1.0

2010-08-08 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Lukas Theussl, Emmanuel Venisse, Olivier Lamy, Arnaud Héritier, Hervé Boutemy, Dennis Lundberg +1 (non binding): Paul Benedict I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. On 2010-08-05 00:41, Dennis Lundber

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-08 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 Arnaud On Aug 7, 2010, at 9:54 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > In order to have a good companion to the coming Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2 > release. > I'd like to release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3. > We solved 10 issues : > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-08 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 Tested with success on various projects Arnaud On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 28 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Linkcheck Plugin version 1.0

2010-08-08 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 from me On 2010-08-05 00:41, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > This is the first release of this plugin. There are no issues in JIRA. > > If you want to see it in action, it has been configured in a profile > called "linkcheck" in the POM for the Maven site. > > Staging repo: > https://reposi

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-08 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2010-08-08 20:07, Olivier Lamy wrote: > 2010/8/8 Tony Chemit : >> +1 (I'd like to work only with maven 3 and the site plugin is the last break >> for it) >> >> but some stuff seems not to be any longer possible with this version. >> >> 1) merging reporting >> >> I configured in two profiles a o

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven SCM 1.4 (Take 2)

2010-08-08 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 Arnaud On Aug 5, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > > In preparation of the Release Plugin release, I'd like to release Maven Scm > 1.4. > Change since first try : fix for SCM-568 > We solved 23 issues : > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=16

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-08 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, After the release, I wanted to ask others devs on what to do with branch and trunk. But it's an other step. Currently this branch should work as last 2.x release (except issues sure :-) ) So we have put in the wiki some informations regarding changes for configuration and reporting plugin compa

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-08 Thread Anders Hammar
I don't find any information regarding how the plugin's site is going to be managed. As there will be two active branches of the plugin (right?), having just one site could be confusing I think. /Anders On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 21:54, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > In order to have a good companion

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-08 Thread Henri Gomez
+0 Good news and thanks for releasing it ! 2010/8/8 Tony Chemit : > +1 (none binding) works fine on all our central safe projects. > > Great job :) > > Tony > > Le Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:16:42 +0200, > Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> We solved 28 issues: >> http://jira.codehaus.org/secur

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-08 Thread Olivier Lamy
2010/8/8 Tony Chemit : > +1 (I'd like to work only with maven 3 and the site plugin is the last break > for it) > > but some stuff seems not to be any longer possible with this version. > > 1) merging reporting > > I configured in two profiles a old way reporting section and activate them > when

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven SCM 1.4

2010-08-08 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding) : John Casey, Benjamin Bentmann, Hervé Boutemy, Olivier Lamy +1 (non binding) : Evgeny Mandrikov So I will continue the release process. Thanks for your time, -- Olivier ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-08 Thread Tony Chemit
+1 (I'd like to work only with maven 3 and the site plugin is the last break for it) but some stuff seems not to be any longer possible with this version. 1) merging reporting I configured in two profiles a old way reporting section and activate them when generating the site : all reports are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-08 Thread Tony Chemit
+1 (none binding) works fine on all our central safe projects. Great job :) Tony Le Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:16:42 +0200, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 28 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090 > > There are still a couple of iss

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-08 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Olivier Lamy wrote: Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-070/ +1 Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.o

[VOTE] Release Maven Shade Plugin 1.4

2010-08-08 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, We solved 4 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&version=16499 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11540&status=1 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-08 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Stéphane On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 28 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?res