repository.apache.org <-> repo1.maven.org

2010-06-18 Thread Gabriele Columbro
Dear Mavens, cross-posting this to the Chemistry [1] Dev list, as I would like ask for a probably simple suggestion as we approach the first OpenCMIS 0.1.0-incubating release [2] - *horray* :) We successfully configured SNAPSHOT deployment to [4], and we're ready and set for following the

Re: Maven 2.x bugs -> 3.0?

2010-06-18 Thread Brett Porter
The 2.2.2 stuff is what eventually could/should be released to round out that series whether 3.0 is out or not. The (< 20) bugs in 2.2.x still need to be reviewed for whether they apply to either version or not. I'm more concerned about the 300 bugs split between the "3.x to be reviewed" (olde

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

2010-06-18 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Well, we had an issue: https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-644 but it was fixed more then a year ago... maybe he suffered from that one? But index downloaded from central was never suffering from this issue (it is not a Nexus instance, and Central would not be a group anyway). Use the lates

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

2010-06-18 Thread nicolas de loof
I discussed with the author of alf-maven-osecm (that suggested me this feature) and he reported me he first tried to use the repo index but didn't find the hash in it. I've not tried by myslef. If hash is included, please close my Jira issue on Nexus and I'll double check this. 2010/6/18 Tamás Cse

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

2010-06-18 Thread Tamás Cservenák
I don't get it, what do you mean by "repository index generated by Nexus ... doesn't include the artifact hash"? What makes you think hash is not on the index? Thanks, ~t~ On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:52 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm working on MDEP-269

Re: Maven 2.x bugs -> 3.0?

2010-06-18 Thread Paul Benedict
Have you tried goal dependency:tree ? On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > my understanding is that 2.2.1 is stable..3.0 seems to be alpha currently > > > on a side note I would really like to see a plugin that displays transitive > dependencies..i just spent some time windi

RE: Maven 2.x bugs -> 3.0?

2010-06-18 Thread Martin Gainty
my understanding is that 2.2.1 is stable..3.0 seems to be alpha currently on a side note I would really like to see a plugin that displays transitive dependencies..i just spent some time winding thru about 12 layers until I found a small bug in surefire it seems the plugin.xml for surefire s

Maven 2.x bugs -> 3.0?

2010-06-18 Thread Paul Benedict
I presume that Maven 2.2 is on life-support with the heavy emphasis on the future of Maven 3. Is that a correct understanding? If so, I wonder if the tagged 2.2/2.x unresolved issues are particular to that branch, or are they bugs also in the trunk? Paul --

[MDEP-269] please review

2010-06-18 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi folks, I'm working on MDEP-269 - convert a legacy lib/*.jar to maven I've attached a patch to Jira as I'd like your opinion on the way to support this use case. My patch uses Nexus REST API to query the repository manager for artifacts based on local

RE: Base Abstract Mojo

2010-06-18 Thread Giuseppe.Greco
YES it was a typo... and now it works! I'm sorry but yesterday after 12 hours at my desk I was a little bit burned out. Thanks a lot! Jeff > -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 9:59 PM > To: Maven Developers List