On Friday 11 June 2010 1:40:07 pm Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> Interesting info, and good numbers! Weave is a double edged sword;
> while it may be promising even
> faster builds, by design it has this irritating tendency to run mojos
> (of the same execution in different modules)
> *exactly* in par
Interesting info, and good numbers! Weave is a double edged sword;
while it may be promising even
faster builds, by design it has this irritating tendency to run mojos
(of the same execution in different modules)
*exactly* in parallel, more or less simulating how I'd write a unit
test to test threa
Well, weave mode doesn't work for CXF. Ends up with a NullPointerException
down in antrun-plugin someplace. Thus, I cannot help you there.
For CXF on my i7 820QM (4 cores, 8 threads) turning off checkstyle/pmd and
having everything already code generated/compiled (so mostly just running
I am picking up some positive tweets here and there, but I'd be really
happy if those of you who test parallel building could report back with
some numbers in response to this message. I am particularly interested
in the difference between parallel and weave (and linear too), mostly to
assess that
You do your coding work, I'll take care of the legal for you. The model of
everyone having to check everything is stupid. Code away, if I find a problem
we'll yank it.
On Jun 11, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> fr., 11.06.2010 kl. 06.35 -0700, skrev Jason van Zyl:
>> On Jun 10, 20
imo where ever you drop the code just make it very clear where it came
from, a link to this thread might not hurt to add as well...point
being as others have said it should be perfectly fine for code @ the
ASF but these sorts of things have a way of rearing their ugly head
years down the road and h
On 11/06/2010, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> fr., 11.06.2010 kl. 06.35 -0700, skrev Jason van Zyl:
>
> > On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:27 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> >
> > > I have a memoizer
> > > (http://www.javaconcurrencyinpractice.com/listings/Memoizer.java) that
> > > I'd like to include "som
fr., 11.06.2010 kl. 06.35 -0700, skrev Jason van Zyl:
> On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:27 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> > I have a memoizer
> > (http://www.javaconcurrencyinpractice.com/listings/Memoizer.java) that
> > I'd like to include "somewhere" in our code base. It's like 30 lines of
> > code or
On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:27 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> I have a memoizer
> (http://www.javaconcurrencyinpractice.com/listings/Memoizer.java) that
> I'd like to include "somewhere" in our code base. It's like 30 lines of
> code or so.
>
> Ï've seen this snippet of code (or extremely minor per
On 11/06/2010, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 11/06/2010, at 4:27 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> > I have a memoizer
> > (http://www.javaconcurrencyinpractice.com/listings/Memoizer.java) that
> > I'd like to include "somewhere" in our code base. It's like 30 lines of
> > code or so.
> >
> >
On 11/06/2010, at 4:27 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> I have a memoizer
> (http://www.javaconcurrencyinpractice.com/listings/Memoizer.java) that
> I'd like to include "somewhere" in our code base. It's like 30 lines of
> code or so.
>
> Ï've seen this snippet of code (or extremely minor permut
On 11/06/2010, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> I have a memoizer
> (http://www.javaconcurrencyinpractice.com/listings/Memoizer.java) that
> I'd like to include "somewhere" in our code base. It's like 30 lines of
> code or so.
>
> Ï've seen this snippet of code (or extremely minor permutations of i
12 matches
Mail list logo
