On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Henrique Prange wrote:
>
>> It did the trick. The solution worked for both Maven 2.2.1 and Maven 3,
>> as you said.
>
> Glad to hear.
>
Why don't we just proactively ignore the packaging in artifact handlers?
>> Just out of curiosity, wi
Looks like one of Wikipedia's content managers deleted the page.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:16 PM, lukewpatterson
wrote:
>
>
> Tim O'Brien wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
>> the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
>>
Tim O'Brien wrote:
>
> Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
> the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-1-IsJuliaAntonova%2FTumlareoutoftheoffice%3F
>
looks like there is a
man, its been a year already? :)
sheesh!
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 15:20, sebb wrote:
> Maybe someone should let her colleagues in on the fun that can be had
> from OoO autoreplies ;-)
>
> I wonder if the company realises how much internal informatio
Maybe someone should let her colleagues in on the fun that can be had
from OoO autoreplies ;-)
I wonder if the company realises how much internal information is
being allowed to leak out in OoO autoreplies...
On 30/04/2010, John Casey wrote:
> nice!
>
>
> On 4/30/10 3:33 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
2010/4/30 Tim O'Brien :
> Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
> the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-1-IsJuliaAntonova%2FTumlareoutoftheoffice%3F
Oh dear I'm crying for th
nice!
On 4/30/10 3:33 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-1-IsJuliaAntonova%2FTumlareoutoftheoffice%3F
On Fri,
Henrique Prange wrote:
It did the trick. The solution worked for both Maven 2.2.1 and Maven 3,
as you said.
Glad to hear.
Just out of curiosity, will the definition of a lifecycle extension
change after Maven 3 integration with Guice is complete?
Not sure what kind of change you exactly ha
Julia, where are you visiting this time?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
> Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
> the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-
Hi Benjamin,
It did the trick. The solution worked for both Maven 2.2.1 and Maven 3,
as you said.
Just out of curiosity, will the definition of a lifecycle extension
change after Maven 3 integration with Guice is complete?
Thank you very much for your help.
Cheers,
Henrique
On 30/04/10 1
Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-1-IsJuliaAntonova%2FTumlareoutoftheoffice%3F
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, John Casey wrote:
> It
It's good to ALWAYS know just where Julia is...or, rather, isn't.
On 4/30/10 3:11 PM, Julia Antonova wrote:
I will be out of the office starting 30.04.2010 and will not return until
04.05.2010.
I have no acces to my mailbox, I will reply to your message upon return.
For urgent issues please c
I will be out of the office starting 30.04.2010 and will not return until
04.05.2010.
I have no acces to my mailbox, I will reply to your message upon return.
For urgent issues please contact my colleagues:
Sergey Khomyakov / Administration - serge...@tumlare.com
Irina Pashina / Administration -
Hi,
We solved 7 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11138&version=15050
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MJAVADOC+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+AND+fixVersion+is+EMP
I bet there are still lots of checksum issues with maven central, I
would suggest to strongly encourage ppl to file issues with MEV and
actively fix them
-D
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> considering the recent fixes to checksums for stuff in central, I wa
Hi,
considering the recent fixes to checksums for stuff in central, I was
wondering what's the overall state of (existing) checksums on central
these days?
Assuming checksums are correct where present, this should put us in a
good position to introduce a new checksum policy "fail-if-present"
ping :)
I added a usage note on every archetype site to quickly test creating a
project from an archetype, if it can help...
Hervé
Le mardi 27 avril 2010, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I want to release Maven Archetypes parent pom - maven-archetype-bundles
> version 4- and some Maven Arche
Henrique Prange wrote:
When building from the parent module using Maven 3, the following
classpath entry has been produced:
[...]/Wonder/Frameworks/Core/JavaWOExtensions/target/JavaWOExtensions-5.0.0-SNAPSHOT.woframework
And the produced classpath entry for the same build using Maven 2.2.1:
[
Hi guys,
validating ("mvn validate") our ~400 projects with M3 I had to recognize,
that it is a lot slower compared to M2.2. Now it takes 99 secs compared to
39 secs with M2.2. Basically this is not a really important, but the reason
why raises some additionally questions.
We have some plugins
19 matches
Mail list logo
