+1
Works for Tycho (although I had to fix a couple of sloppy tests) and few
our internal projects I work on.
--
Regards,
Igor
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
We solved 39 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
There are still a couple of issues
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> No.
> It's 3.x prerequisite.
It would be good if there was some mechanism so that the site
generation could be made to work with either m2 or m3. Perhaps by
activating different profiles dependant on the maven version -
something like:
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 19 avril 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16
> 089
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&p
I think the cause of bad checksum is from using wagon's httpclient
alternative see
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-wagon-providers.html
I attempted to use it to deploy large artifact as a work around for
OOM issue and saw this problem, but could not confirm if my setup is
the problem.
Thanks =)
-Original Message-
From: Justin Edelson [mailto:justinedel...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 21 april 2010 15:18
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Reference to available data for mojos?
You can look at the JavaDoc of the MavenProject class:
http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.2.1/maven-pr
You can look at the JavaDoc of the MavenProject class:
http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.2.1/maven-project/apidocs/org/apache/maven/project/MavenProject.html
On 4/21/10 8:45 AM, Ludwig Magnusson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When writing a mojo there is a possibility to access information about the
> project runn
HHi,
This could cause wrong checsums:
Quote from Kevan: "Maven 2.2 was used in creating the xbean 3.6 release.
Evidently 2.2 had an issue uploading files to Nexus twice and
calculating checksums on the doubled files."
http://old.nabble.com/Maven-central-has-corrupted-artifact-org.apache.xbea
juven is on the case. We should have correct checksums shortly..
Milos
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 21/04/2010, at 5:59 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote
On 21/04/2010, at 5:59 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
>>
>>> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc
>>> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc
>>> both say
>>> gpg: Signature
Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
>
>> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc
>> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc
>> both say
>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID
>> B0874707 gpg: Good signature from "Mil
2010/4/21 :
> Hello Team,
> Please unsubscirbe me from the "Maven Developers list"
Follow the arrow:
|
|
|
|
V
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.ap
Hello Team,
Please unsubscirbe me from the "Maven Developers list"
Thanks,
Chandrashekar
Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, dis
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
>
> > gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc
> > gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc
> > both say
> > gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID
> B08
On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc
> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc
> both say
> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID B0874707
> gpg: Good signature from "Milos Kleint "
>
> How do I recrea
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 21/04/2010, at 3:40 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
>
> > hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the
> checksums
> > became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform
> combo.
> > I can't recall any prob
15 matches
Mail list logo
