Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

On 21/04/2010, at 3:40 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: > hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the checksums > became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform combo. > I can't recall any problems with the process. I specifically double checked > that there are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

+1 -Lukas Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&status=1 Staging repo: http

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the checksums became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform combo. I can't recall any problems with the process. I specifically double checked that there are gpg signatures, but assumed checksums are correct. They

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

+1 works well here. On 4/19/10 1:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&st

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

Hi Milos, I'm not sure if you did the plexus-compiler release in conjunction with this or if that was someone else, but the checksums for it are incorrect (see users@ today for those using The 2.3 release). Do you know what happened? If the JARs are correct maybe we can just fix the checksums

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Archetype version 2.0-alpha-5

Lets move to call the next one a final release or at least a beta. We have too many alphas floating around 2010/4/20 Raphaël Piéroni : > +1 > > Tested using Maven 2.2.0 > > Many thanks to Hervé > > Regards, > > Raphaël > > 2010/4/18 Hervé BOUTEMY > >> Hi, >> >> We solved 27 issues: >> >> http://j

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Archetype version 2.0-alpha-5

+1 Tested using Maven 2.2.0 Many thanks to Hervé Regards, Raphaël 2010/4/18 Hervé BOUTEMY > Hi, > > We solved 27 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11095&version=14254 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

+1 2010/4/19 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > We solved 39 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&status=1 > > Staging repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

+1 Working here. It's nice to see maven getting closer to the 3.0\o/ /Paul Le lundi 19 avril 2010 19:50:28, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 39 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16 > 089 > > There are still a couple of issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

+1 Emmanuel On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 39 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

No. It's 3.x prerequisite. 2010/4/20 Brett Porter : > > On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY : >>> what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? >> >> Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff. >> >>> Olivier, is there something cr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > > 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY : >> what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? > > Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff. > >> Olivier, is there something critical missing? > > No except some spare time :-) Does that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > provided does not make sense for a dependency of a plugin. for a dependency > of a project, yes, but of a plugin, no.  so I would think it is an error on > your side You are right. After changing that the build went on flawlessly. +1 (N

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

provided does not make sense for a dependency of a plugin. for a dependency of a project, yes, but of a plugin, no. so I would think it is an error on your side On 20 April 2010 08:11, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Definitely not a killer, but perhaps something to know: I just tried 3 > the release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

Hi, 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY : > what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff. > Olivier, is there something critical missing? No except some spare time :-) > Last time I tested a SNAPSHOT, we fixed some issues then it seemed quite go

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

Definitely not a killer, but perhaps something to know: I just tried 3 the release build on one of my projects and got the following error message: [ERROR] The project com.tsystems.icto.tom:tom-icto-dependencies:0.2.22-SNAPSHOT (C:\workspace\tom-icto-parent\tom-icto-dependencies\pom.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? Olivier, is there something critical missing? Last time I tested a SNAPSHOT, we fixed some issues then it seemed quite good to me. Regards, Hervé Le mardi 20 avril 2010, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : > Ok thx. > I agree that we have a good tests co