Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Ok thx. I agree that we have a good tests coverage to be quiet to switch. Is there something which could be integrated before 3.0 final ? I remember I saw a twit from you several weeks ago about replacing the dl/ul layer to use a non-jetty stuff. Arnaud On Tuesday, April 20, 2010, Jason van Zyl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Brian Fox
+1 works ok here. On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > +1 > > On 19 April 2010 19:12, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Wee! >> >> On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > We solved 39 issues: >> > >> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
On 20/04/2010, at 8:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>> Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >> On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >> >>> Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What >>> is the meaning? Are there any plans of a sche

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > >> Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What >> is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final? >> > > When there's a long enough pe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
If Stuart finishes the work it will go in. I have 100% confidence in the ITs and that we'll find anything before users do as a result of switching the container. We have had very few problems with flipping Nexus from Plexus to Guice and Stuart was able to fix those very quickly. Stuart is like

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What > is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final? > When there's a long enough period where users don't report any serious issues it will be 3.0.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 Thus we start only bug fixes releases ? Guice won't be included in 3.0 ? Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net 2010/4/19 Tamás Cservenák > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < > benjamin.bentm..

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 ma., 19.04.2010 kl. 19.50 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann: > Hi, > > We solved 39 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Shane Isbell
+1 Glad to see a movement to beta Shane

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 39 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Issu

Re: [Help]maven release plugin

2010-04-19 Thread Brian Fox
What project are you a committer on? On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Delos wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to set up a staging site with "mvn release:perform". The process > seems blocked when I saw the message below. > > [INFO] [INFO] Generating "Dependency Convergence" report. > [INFO] [INFO] [si

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final? Thanks, Jochen -- Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling! -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 On 19 April 2010 19:12, Jason van Zyl wrote: > +1 > > Wee! > > On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 39 issues: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089 > > > > There are still a couple of issues left

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 Wee! On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 39 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=tr

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&status=1 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/reposito