Re: [jira] Updated: (MNG-4568) maven-embedder 3.0-alpha-6 doesn't contain the MavenEmbedder class

On 31/03/2010, at 10:33 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > I consider it orthogonal to the CLI and it's not really a new feature per se > and I don't think folks want to wait until 3.1. Np, as long as we aren't starting to consider 3.1 as "too big a deal" for small new things. We're notoriously bad at

Re: [jira] Updated: (MNG-4568) maven-embedder 3.0-alpha-6 doesn't contain the MavenEmbedder class

I consider it orthogonal to the CLI and it's not really a new feature per se and I don't think folks want to wait until 3.1. On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > Should this be in 3.1? Seems like adding a new feature post 3.0? > > On 31/03/2010, at 2:28 AM, Jason van Zyl (JIRA) wr

Re: [jira] Updated: (MNG-4568) maven-embedder 3.0-alpha-6 doesn't contain the MavenEmbedder class

Should this be in 3.1? Seems like adding a new feature post 3.0? On 31/03/2010, at 2:28 AM, Jason van Zyl (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > > Jason van Zyl updated MNG-4568: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

+1 On 30 March 2010 10:54, Milos Kleint wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130&version=16097 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-00< > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ma

[VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

Hi, We solved 6 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130&version=16097 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-00 3 Staging site (sync pending): http://maven.apache.org/p

Re: annotations support in compiler mojo

to me, projects that have their own annotation processors are a bit corner-case. We should have a documented approach for that situation for sure. To me the workaround with resource:copy goal that copies the META-INF/services/xxx entry *after* compilation sounds like the best solution. Milos On

Re: annotations support in compiler mojo

On 29 March 2010 10:35, Milos Kleint wrote: > yes, one place when this issue arises is when your own project defines a > annotation processor of it's own. See > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-97 Hmm, maybe we'll have to split the compiler plugin up into two different executions for pro

Maven Android Plugin release train

Hi All, Hugo, Ricardo and myself have just released a new set of components for working with Maven and Android. If you are interested in Android and Maven please join us on the Maven Android Developers mailing list. at http://groups.google.com/group/maven-android-developers We hope to see you on