Which classpath? The order should be as in your Pom followed by Parent
Pom, Grandparent Pom etc.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Vladimir Jigounov wrote:
>
> I'm using maven 2.2.1.
> Order of libraries on classpath does not match order of dependencies in
> pom.xml
> Is there any way to specify o
Maven has supported an ordered classpath for a while now (since 2.0.9
IIRC). Can you provide more details?
Justin
On Mar 10, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Vladimir Jigounov
wrote:
>
> I'm using maven 2.2.1.
> Order of libraries on classpath does not match order of dependencies
> in
> pom.xml
> Is there any
I'm using maven 2.2.1.
Order of libraries on classpath does not match order of dependencies in
pom.xml
Is there any way to specify order of jar files in pom.xml?
I understand that shuffling or jars makes you stronger, but still,
Java is sensitive to order of libraries, why not support this in mave
+1
Arnaud Héritier
Software Factory Manager
eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com
---
http://www.aheritier.net
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Nord, James wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This isn't new problem (was the same with the reactor plugin) but I think
> the message is new and incorrect whic
Hi all,
This isn't new problem (was the same with the reactor plugin) but I think the
message is new and incorrect which may lead to user confusion.
In a multimodule build (mvn clean verify) if one module fails unit tests you
get the following printed
[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you
+1
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Kristian Rosenvold <
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.o
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1
And +1 to change "alpha" to something less frightening for corporate projects.
"rc", "preview", or milestone would be fine.
Thanks
Julien
- Message d'origine
> De : nicolas de loof
> À : Maven Developers List
> Envoyé le : Mer 10 Mars 2010, 9 h 15 min 17 s
> Objet : Re: [VOTE]
+1
Still partisant of a "milestone" naming convention to avoid assumptions on
code quality and stability.
2010/3/10 Olivier Lamy
> +1 (IMHO we could change the name to at least beta as it works really
> fine :-) ).
>
> 2010/3/9 Benjamin Bentmann :
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 22 issues:
> >
> http
+1 (IMHO we could change the name to at least beta as it works really
fine :-) ).
2010/3/9 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 22 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16087
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus
10 matches
Mail list logo