+1
Arnaud Héritier
Software Factory Manager
eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com
---
http://www.aheritier.net
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/
>>
>> Staging si
I will be out of the office starting 09/02/2010 and will not return until
11/02/2010.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/
Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plugin-2.5
+1
While building the source bundle on Windows I noticed a failure of the
IT "check-pass". In detail, it reported a viola
Le Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:06:59 +0100,
Olivier Lamy a écrit :
+1
> Hi,
> I'd like to release maven-checkstyle-plugin version 2.5.
> It's a small release to make it working with maven 3.
>
> We solved 1 issue:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-123
>
> Staging repo:
> https://reposito
I do not know if I can vote, but anyway +1
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:27 PM, nicolas de loof
wrote:
> +1
>
> 2010/2/8 Olivier Lamy
>
>> Hi,
>> I'd like to release maven-checkstyle-plugin version 2.5.
>> It's a small release to make it working with maven 3.
>>
>> We solved 1 issue:
>>
>> http://jir
+1
2010/2/8 Olivier Lamy
> Hi,
> I'd like to release maven-checkstyle-plugin version 2.5.
> It's a small release to make it working with maven 3.
>
> We solved 1 issue:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-123
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/mave
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-checkstyle-plugin version 2.5.
It's a small release to make it working with maven 3.
We solved 1 issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-123
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/
Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org
+1
--
Olivier
2010/2/7 Dennis Lundberg :
> Hi,
>
> This vote is for the entire Maven Release project, which includes Maven
> Release Manager and Maven Release Plugin.
>
> The source bundle now correctly runs 'maven test'.
>
> We solved 31 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa
Grand so
On 8 February 2010 11:47, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
> How will I write a plugin that works for both 2.x and 3.x and can detect
>> if
>> the build is running in parallel?
>>
>
> /** @parameter default-value="${session.parallel}" */
> private Boolean parallel;
>
Stephen Connolly wrote:
How will I write a plugin that works for both 2.x and 3.x and can detect if
the build is running in parallel?
/** @parameter default-value="${session.parallel}" */
private Boolean parallel;
Benjamin
On 8 February 2010 11:20, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote
>
> >
> > >I think it would be acceptable to break a build if forkmode=never and
> > >parallel build=true... i.e. have the maven api's expose the fact
On 8 February 2010 11:23, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> Anyone have any suggestions on how plugins should find out if
>> they're being run in parallel ?
>>
>
> Add a getter to the MavenSession that allows plugins to query the current
> mode of operation.
>
>
How will I
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions on how plugins should find out if
they're being run in parallel ?
Add a getter to the MavenSession that allows plugins to query the
current mode of operation.
Benjamin
---
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote
>
> >I think it would be acceptable to break a build if forkmode=never and
> >parallel build=true... i.e. have the maven api's expose the fact that we
> are
> >running in a parallel build, and then surefire
On 8 February 2010 09:18, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> >
> > On 07/02/2010, at 6:16 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> >
> > > I just discovered that the source of the hideous concurrency problem
> > > I've been tracking for some time is the sys
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 07/02/2010, at 6:16 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> > I just discovered that the source of the hideous concurrency problem
> > I've been tracking for some time is the system property "user.dir".
>
>
> > Surefire basically sets the follo
16 matches
Mail list logo
