Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 30 January 2010 02:38, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: > > > could we use "milestone" as names in replacement for "alpha", so that we > get > > more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ? > > > > I can understand the difficu

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release version 2.0

2010-01-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 31 January 2010 11:12, Peter Janes wrote: > The new plugin *almost* solves MRELEASE-458, in that setting > updateWorkingCopyVersions=false for release:branch does result in the > working copy version being preserved at the end of the release process. > However, the POM is changed twice in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release version 2.0

2010-01-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 31 January 2010 10:52, Stephen Connolly wrote: > are you planning on removing the duplicates from jira. I only had a quick > look, but it would seem to have a lot if dups of bugs fixed by this release, > eg MRELEASE-514 looks like it's a dup. > > I'll check the binaries on Monday against my tro

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release version 2.0

2010-01-30 Thread Peter Janes
Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-068/ The new plugin *almost* solves MRELEASE-458, in that setting updateWorkingCopyVersions=false for release:branch does result in the working copy version being preserved at the end of the releas

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release version 2.0

2010-01-30 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-068/ While I could successfully release Plexus 1.5.4 using the new plugin version, the plugin's source bundle is incomplete, causing the following test failures Results : Failed tests: testRe

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release version 2.0

2010-01-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
are you planning on removing the duplicates from jira. I only had a quick look, but it would seem to have a lot if dups of bugs fixed by this release, eg MRELEASE-514 looks like it's a dup. I'll check the binaries on Monday against my troublesome work projects Sent from my [rhymes with tryPo

[VOTE] Release Maven Release version 2.0

2010-01-30 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, This vote is for the entire Maven Release project, which includes Maven Release Manager and Maven Release Plugin. We solved 30 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11144&styleName=Html&version=15113 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.co

[ANN] Maven Verifier Plugin 1.0 Released

2010-01-30 Thread Dennis Lundberg
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Verifier Plugin, version 1.0 This plugin is useful for integration tests - verifies the existence of certain conditions. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-verifier-plugin/ You should specify the version in your project's plugin c

Re: How to have a mojo goal dependent on compile goal

2010-01-30 Thread Kay Kay
Adding this to the mojo on top, works. Thanks. * @execute phase="compile" On 01/30/2010 11:06 AM, Justin Edelson wrote: Please read the @execute descriptor documention on this page: http://maven.apache.org/developers/mojo-api-specification.html Justin On 1/30/10 1:48 PM, Kay Kay wrote: I

Re: How to have a mojo goal dependent on compile goal

2010-01-30 Thread Justin Edelson
Please read the @execute descriptor documention on this page: http://maven.apache.org/developers/mojo-api-specification.html Justin On 1/30/10 1:48 PM, Kay Kay wrote: I have defined a class inheriting from AbstractMojo with @goal mygoal. So, everytime we do $ mvn myplugin:mygoal I want to

How to have a mojo goal dependent on compile goal

2010-01-30 Thread Kay Kay
I have defined a class inheriting from AbstractMojo with @goal mygoal. So, everytime we do $ mvn myplugin:mygoal I want to invoke the compile goal ( $ mvn compile ) behind the scenes and my goal getting launched only if the former was a success. Is there an annotation / configuration in pom.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Verifier plugin version 1.0

2010-01-30 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Brett Porter, Dennis Lundberg +1 (non binding): Stephen Connolly I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. On 2010-01-21 22:48, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 2 issues: > http://jira.codehau

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Verifier plugin version 1.0

2010-01-30 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 On 2010-01-21 22:48, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 2 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12800&styleName=Html&projectId=11149 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=1

Re: annotations support in compiler mojo

2010-01-30 Thread Milos Kleint
can I read silence as lazy consensus to add annotation processing to the compiler plugin? Milos On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to start a discussion about how annotations are supported in maven > builds. I'm currently trying to use some NetBeans Platf