Hi Brian,
Great, i am looking forward to see the snapshots deployed soon.
Should I ping you after few days I dont see them?
Big Thanks
-Dan
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
> If it's in the grid, it would be deployed to repository.sonatype.org
> and I have rao proxying that
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Clean
Plugin, version 2.4.
This plugin is used to clean the project output directories. Please see
the plugin's site for more details:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/
To use the updated plugin in your project
Hello to all,
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Doxygen Maven Plugin
Release 1.0
The Homepage (intermediate?) for the Plugin is:
http://www.supose.org/projects/show/mavendoxygen
The ChangeLog for this Release (first one), can be seen at:
http://www.supose.org/versions/show
If you are running java5 or higher, there's a good chance you can just
drop in surefire2.5 and junit-4.8.1, without making any code changes at
all. Although I haven't tested this specifically, I think it should
work.
You can read about how to do it here - I'll try to get parts of it into
some offi
> The problem we have allowing unchecked rsyncs is that in the past we find
> that the control over what is actually put in the repositories is not well
> managed in some cases. Using http://oss.sonatype.org helps us maintain a very
> high level of quality. It basically amounts to changing where y
Thanks for your prompt response.
We are using junit 3.8 unfortunately. We will look at upgrading
version but this patch will work with no upgrades to junit.
On 1/15/10, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Eh Surefire 2.5 (which is in the process of being released)
> supports the parallel execution fea
I'm not in any dire rush to release the plugin, so I'll defer to you. If I can
release it I will, otherwise I'll wait.
On 2010-01-15, at 11:30 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>>
>>
>> Arnaud is the one with all the outstanding issues - he should comment
>> if they can get bumped to the next version
Eh Surefire 2.5 (which is in the process of being released)
supports the parallel execution features of JUnit 4.7+
If that works for you, no patch required
-Stephen
2010/1/15 Colm O'Donnell :
> Hi,
>
> I work for a company that have a large number of junit tests. We have
> migrated from ant
>
>
> Arnaud is the one with all the outstanding issues - he should comment
> if they can get bumped to the next version.
> All those unassigned look suitable for bumping.
>
I'm not working on it and I won't be able soon
I unassign all my issues. You can postpone issues you don't want to fix.
You
On 2010-01-15, at 11:15 AM, Tony Chemit wrote:
> Le Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:41:51 -0500,
> Brian Fox a écrit :
>
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> We are actually in the process of updating the documentation, but
>> we've decided not to accept new Rsync requests except for forges. For
>> individual projects, it's
Hi,
I work for a company that have a large number of junit tests. We have
migrated from ant to maven recently but are faced with a serious problem
with respect to the time to execute the tests. We used to execute some tests
in parallel with ant but it was not great and depended on a lot of manual
If it's in the grid, it would be deployed to repository.sonatype.org
and I have rao proxying that maven-snapshot folder. I figured it's
more bandwidth efficient to proxy requested items than to push every
single snapshot from the grid across.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Le Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:41:51 -0500,
Brian Fox a écrit :
> Hi Tony,
>
> We are actually in the process of updating the documentation, but
> we've decided not to accept new Rsync requests except for forges. For
> individual projects, it's simply too much overhead to handle rsyncs
> and it isn't sc
Hi Tony,
We are actually in the process of updating the documentation, but
we've decided not to accept new Rsync requests except for forges. For
individual projects, it's simply too much overhead to handle rsyncs
and it isn't scalable, not to mention there isn't a good way to
enforce quality. Inst
Hi guys,
We'd like [1] to synch our repository [2] with central.
Actually our repository is on a vserver with ss access), We aims to add a
knockd to secure it, and it would be much appreciate if we could know the ip of
your machine which will do the rsynch (to add a special in firewall just for
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Olivier Lamy, Vincent Siveton, Hervé
Boutemy
+1 (non-binding): Nicolas de Loof, Kristian Rosenvold
I will promote the artifacts to the central repository and continue with
the release.
Benjamin
-
Hi,
I have, based on a question in a forum, reread the documentation about
inheritance in the pom's...
the following information is documented:
--
The packaging type required to be pom for parent and aggregation
(multi-module) projects. These types define the goals bound to a
Hi,
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Scm, version 1.3.
Release Notes - Maven SCM - Version 1.3
** Bug
* [SCM-261] - Synergy provider assumes instance of 1 for
projects... won't work for distributed CM (and some other scenarios)
* [SCM-418] - Support for Per
Hm I have one problem.
depProject.getDependencyArtifacts() is null
How to resolve this project dependency ??
Best regards
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-to-get-dependency-artifacts-for-another-artifact---tp27167882p27173357.html
Sent from the Maven Develope
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding) : Benjamin Bentmann, Hervé BOUTEMY, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non-binding) : Subir Sasikumar, Mark Struberg.
I will finish the release process.
--
Olivier
-
To unsubscrib
20 matches
Mail list logo