In 2.x the plugins you get from the lifecycle depend on which phase
was executed, and it frankly drove me crazy trying to write the
enforcer plugin rules. I think there are several things a plugin
should be able to get:
1) the original model as parsed from disk with no interpolation or inheritence
2010/1/9 Peter Lynch :
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2010/1/9 Benjamin Bentmann :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > in response to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4523, I would like to
>> > double-check that the behavior observed in Maven
Peter Lynch wrote:
It is far from invariant. I noticed in the debugger that the project model
contained 4 plugins ( clean,site, install, deploy if i recall), none being
the one explicitly called in Maven 3.
Those plugins are contributed by lifecycle mappings corresponding to the
packaging of
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/1/9 Benjamin Bentmann :
> > Hi,
> >
> > in response to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4523, I would like to
> > double-check that the behavior observed in Maven 2 is by
> design/intention
> > an
Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-)
On 9 Jan 2010, at 14:09, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Stephen Connolly wrote:
2010/1/9 Stephen Connolly :
2010/1/9 Dennis Lundberg :
Stephen Connolly wrote:
Hi,
We solved 15 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=
Do we have a problem with the mailing lists?
I didn't receive a mail about this commit. I have a gap between commits
r896444 and r897254 in my mail. It's ~51 hours. The mail archives
indicate the same thing.
I can see the commit here though:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=897
Stephen Connolly wrote:
> 2010/1/9 Stephen Connolly :
>> 2010/1/9 Dennis Lundberg :
>>> Stephen Connolly wrote:
Hi,
We solved 15 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=14119&styleName=Html
There are still a couple of issues lef
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Brian Fox, Arnaud
Héritier, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non-binding): Igor Fedorenko, Stephen Connolly, Mark Struberg
I will promote the artifacts to the central repository and continue with
the release.
2010/1/9 Stephen Connolly :
> 2010/1/9 Dennis Lundberg :
>> Stephen Connolly wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We solved 15 issues:
>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=14119&styleName=Html
>>>
>>> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>>> http://jira.codehau
2010/1/9 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> in response to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4523, I would like to
> double-check that the behavior observed in Maven 2 is by design/intention
> and needs to be reproduced by Maven 3. It looks odd to me that the effective
> POM is a function of the plug
2010/1/9 Dennis Lundberg :
> Stephen Connolly wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 15 issues:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=14119&styleName=Html
>>
>> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset
Hi,
in response to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4523, I would like to
double-check that the behavior observed in Maven 2 is by
design/intention and needs to be reproduced by Maven 3. It looks odd to
me that the effective POM is a function of the plugin being invoked on CLI.
Benjamin
Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 15 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=14119&styleName=Html
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10541&status=1
>
> Stag
13 matches
Mail list logo
