On 07/01/2010, at 6:45 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>>
>> Is the way this is designed something that's potentially reusable outside of
>> Maven in an embedded scenario? Continuum currently builds Maven projects
>> module by module, with some crude parallelism and the old project sorter.
>> T
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 08:26 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
> On 07/01/2010, at 1:16 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 13:41 +, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> >> however you might have to wait for "install" as the attached artifact
> >> can be replaced in the reactor, e.g. maven-
On 07/01/2010, at 1:04 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> We would like to propose relicensing the code to
> ASL and donate it to the Maven project where it can become part of the
> official Maven repository standard. We have been gathering
> documentation about the Index here[1]
A huge +1 - I've been in fa
Hi All,
I'm trying to fix http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-511, which occurs when
you try to publish a site to an SVN repository where the base directory does
not exist yet. An example scenario is when you have the following
configuration in your POM:
site.svn
scm:svn:
https://m
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
> Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
>> The only significant difference between the weave mode and the regular
>> mode is that the complete execution plan is determined up-front. As a
>> consequence of this the ReactorArtifactRepository (line 83) is for
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
The only significant difference between the weave mode and the regular
mode is that the complete execution plan is determined up-front. As a
consequence of this the ReactorArtifactRepository (line 83) is forced to
use compile output from upstream modules when in weave m
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
In this process I removed your original implementation, simply because
it allowed me to work freely in simplifying my own implementation (and I
truly believe I managed to make some good simplifications). I also
considered that I'd re-add your implementation as a third s
Since it was first published several years ago, the Nexus Maven
Repository Index has become the defacto standard for gathering
information about remote repositories and is currently in use by all
the repository managers and IDE integrations. The Nexus index of
Central is currently downloaded more t
+1
I built successfully eXo enterprise (287 modules).
32min with alpha 06 vs 65 min with 2.2.1 (tests are deactivated).
The only problem I have is MNG-3283 but it is not a regression in 3.x
I did some others tests and didn't find issues
Arnaud Héritier
Software Factory Manager
eXo platform - http:
On 07/01/2010, at 1:16 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 13:41 +, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>> however you might have to wait for "install" as the attached artifact
>> can be replaced in the reactor, e.g. maven-shade-plugin could be
>> replacing the artifact with its shaded
+1.
--
Regards,
Igor
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
We solved 29 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=15996
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&status=1
Stagi
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Patch
Plugin, version 1.1.1.
This plugin is used to apply patches to source files. See the plugin's
site for more details:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-patch-plugin/
To use the updated plugin in your projects, you need to
+1
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2010-01-06, at 6:17 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 29 issues:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=15996
>>
>> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>> http
+1
On 2010-01-06, at 6:17 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 29 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=15996
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 13:41 +, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> however you might have to wait for "install" as the attached artifact
> can be replaced in the reactor, e.g. maven-shade-plugin could be
> replacing the artifact with its shaded version
>
> you only know by the time you hit install (or t
2010/1/6 Kristian Rosenvold :
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:36 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
>> On 06/01/2010, at 10:15 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>>
>> > - Given that parallel execution is an "alternate" mode that may have
>> > additional constraints, does 3.0 need something that is guaranteed to
>>
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:36 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
> On 06/01/2010, at 10:15 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> > - Given that parallel execution is an "alternate" mode that may have
> > additional constraints, does 3.0 need something that is guaranteed to
> > work for the vast majority of proj
On 06/01/2010, at 10:15 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> - Given that parallel execution is an "alternate" mode that may have
> additional constraints, does 3.0 need something that is guaranteed to
> work for the vast majority of projects ? I think Dan's implementation
> does this already, while t
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Arnaud Héritier
I will promote the artifacts to the central repository and continue with
the release.
Benjamin
-
To unsubsc
Hi,
We solved 29 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=15996
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&status=1
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/reposito
Cool. I'll do the *simple* clarifications first:
Without a threads argument it behaves like a totally standard M3. All
integration tests pass, and I spent a lot of energy to make sure I
didn't break anything. So in answer to (1), it builds maven3 without
threading. With threading is a different s
+1
2010/1/6 Emmanuel Venisse
> +1
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have reviewed the patches for the parallel build support and I think
> they
> > are great.
> >
> > I think we should just give Kristian access to work with Dan and other
>
+1
Emmanuel
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have reviewed the patches for the parallel build support and I think they
> are great.
>
> I think we should just give Kristian access to work with Dan and other
> developers who want to support this work.
>
> +1
>
> T
23 matches
Mail list logo
