Olivier Lamy wrote:
Why not using now : System.getenv() ?
As we are now 1.5.
Right you are, good catch!
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apa
done at r895269
Thanks
-Dan
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
>>> Author: dantran
>>> Date: Tue Dec 29 23:33:02 2009
>>> New Revision: 894515
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=894515&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> MDEP-179:Add ability to use an alternate r
Hi,
Why not using now : System.getenv() ?
As we are now 1.5.
It could prevent using the legacy stuff from p-u which "fork" a
process depending on the os.
--
Olivier
2010/1/2 :
> Author: bentmann
> Date: Sat Jan 2 17:44:37 2010
> New Revision: 895245
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=89
Hi Benjamin
Sorry, did not see your comment until today, will look into it
Thanks
-Dan
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
>>> Author: dantran
>>> Date: Tue Dec 29 23:33:02 2009
>>> New Revision: 894515
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=894515&view=
I am going to merge the two together, but i'd like to get 2.5 out first
2010/1/2 Paul Benedict :
> I remember hearing about the fail-safe plugin... Are you going to
> merge into surefire? I think the best choice is to eliminate competing
> plug-ins and aggregating new functionality in one.
>
> Pau
I remember hearing about the fail-safe plugin... Are you going to
merge into surefire? I think the best choice is to eliminate competing
plug-ins and aggregating new functionality in one.
Paul
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> i'm fine with moving my code from mojo to mav
Although Sun's JDK versioning is a non-standard format, I think it's
obvious Sun isn't going to change it soon. (I've been watching the
JSR-294 debate! Yup, they are not changing.) I am +1 on Maven
supporting parsing this special format to make the patch releases
(_XX) naturally comparable with the
On 2010-01-02, at 10:00 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
>>
>>test
>>
>> (1.4,1.5]
>>
>>
>> Now, when do you think does this profile get activated in case the current
>> Java version (as given by ${java.version}) happens to be
>> a) 1.4.0_07
>> b)
It is many more logical. But we'll have to clearly document it because
many users will wrongly suppose they avoid all 1.4 versions with (1.4
Arnaud
On Saturday, January 2, 2010, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
>
>
> test
>
> (1.4,1.5]
>
>
>
> Now
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
test
(1.4,1.5]
Now, when do you think does this profile get activated in case the
current Java version (as given by ${java.version}) happens to be
a) 1.4.0_07
b) 1.4.0_14
c) 1.4.2_07
d) 1.5.0_07
e) 1.5.0_14
f) 1.5.1_14
For better illustr
Hi,
as per MNG-1957, Maven introduced support to activate profiles based on
a version range for the JDK version:
test
(1.4,1.5]
Now, when do you think does this profile get activated in case the
current Java version (as given by ${java.version}) happens to be
a)
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Compiler Plugin, version 2.1
This plugin is used to compile the sources of your project. .
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
org.apache.ma
i'm fine with moving my code from mojo to maven... when I wrote
failsafe I was not an apache committer...
I'd like to sort out scoping toolchains before doing that though
so I was thinking 2.6 could be the merged version
I'd plan on pushing 2.6 in a month or so (i.e. before m3)
-Stephen
2010/1/
And what about the failsafe plugin
This one is very useful and is a copy of surefire dedicated to its with
junit.
Couldn't we move it to Apache and use a shared lib to update them all
together ?
Couldn't we integrate it by default in maven 3 in the lifecycle ?
WDYT ?
Arnaud Héritier
Software Fact
Here is the test plan.
1. We (=benjamin) run all the builds that are currently working with
m3+plugin-enfocer+new surefire plugin -SNAPHOT. If all builds still
pass with the new surefire plugin, then we say all is good
2. If all is good, we (=benjamin or me or somebody else) stage a
release of
Hi Dan,
Author: dantran
Date: Tue Dec 29 23:33:02 2009
New Revision: 894515
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=894515&view=rev
Log:
MDEP-179:Add ability to use an alternate repository at copy and unpack
mojo's execution time
++/**
+ * @return Returns the local.
+ */
+p
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Benjamin, Olivier, Hervé
+1 (non binding): Myself, Tony Chemit
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
-Stephen Connolly
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
17 matches
Mail list logo
