Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-16 Thread Ralph Goers
On Dec 16, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > For all the potential trouble this "enhancement" causes, does it > really have a justifiable performance boost? I mean is copying a pom > really that slow given everything else that has to happen in parallel? > > I know if I go to a folder and run

Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-16 Thread Paul Benedict
I also say move it out, but re-open the ticket for 3.x. It's possible the resolution is correct, and people's procedures are wrong, but give it time for the debate to live out. More thought should go into this before closing it as Won't Fix. Paul On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Jason van Zyl wr

Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
+ 1 For pulling it out On 2009-12-16, at 2:38 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > For all the potential trouble this "enhancement" causes, does it > really have a justifiable performance boost? I mean is copying a pom > really that slow given everything else that has to happen in parallel? > > I know if I go

Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-16 Thread Brian Fox
For all the potential trouble this "enhancement" causes, does it really have a justifiable performance boost? I mean is copying a pom really that slow given everything else that has to happen in parallel? I know if I go to a folder and run mvn install, I expect THOSE EXACT products from this build

Re: [jira] How to exclude certain files from war file.

2009-12-16 Thread Jesse McConnell
issues (unmonitored) and dev (for development) are not lists for this sort of question, try the users list cheers jesse -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:29, sylarStrike wrote: > > Hi , > > I am trying to merge two war files in one by using maven assembly