Re: Please Help

2009-12-07 Thread Peter Lynch
This looks like a user question to me. Try to provide more information to us...@maven.apache.org. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:30 AM, wrote: > > Hello Team, >Please help me in the below problem. I am trying to build the > project, while executing the command "mvn clean install" I am gettin

Offering Help

2009-12-07 Thread Peter Lynch
Hello devs, A long time ago I was once a committer on Apache Maven. However as time passed, life happened elsewhere. Despite this I have been programming in Java for the past 10 years or so and on virtually every project of mine since Maven 1.0.2 I had the opportunity to use Maven for my build tas

Please Help

2009-12-07 Thread Chandrashekar.Marigowda
Hello Team, Please help me in the below problem. I am trying to build the project, while executing the command "mvn clean install" I am getting below error. I have attached screen shot of repository files, what I have in .m2 folder. **

Re: Resolving transitive dependencies in a mojo

2009-12-07 Thread Dan Tran
use this link as example http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/dita-maven-plugin-1.0-beta-1/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/dita/AbstractDitaMojo.java -Dan 2009/12/7 Barış Erdemir : > Hello, > I am trying to resolve transitive dependencies of my project. I need a list > of all dependencies. > > I a

Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-07 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
I agree to fix the behavior like you propose Paul. It will reduce probably a little bit current performances but if it solves the case explained by Tamas, why not ... On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Paul Gier wrote: > It seems that the copyFileIfModified implementation should be changed. > Sin

Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-07 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
ok. I don't know enough GIT and DSCMs. I understand that many people want to work on various branches but I find that dangerous if you kkep the same version. What happens if you deploy SNAPSHOTs binairies in a repository to do continuous integration ? About your problem of optimization, I could un

Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Gier
It seems that the copyFileIfModified implementation should be changed. Since currently it only checks if the source timestamp is newer. Maybe this should be changed to check for the timestamps not equal (and maybe size not equal also) instead of just a newer timestamp. That would allow the op

Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-07 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Okay, let's put it this way: are you saying that all the different GIT reposes out there containing "project A" mirrors should have different versions? Who will coordinate those? It's somehow incompatible with Git (and probably any other distributed SCM) in very fundamental way ~t~ On Mon,

Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-07 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
... "Renaming" (changing GAVs of modules, maybe a LOT of them) is PITA in this case, IMHO. ... mvn versions:set -DnewVersion=A.B.C-optim-SNAPSHOT And it's done ? Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net 2009/12/7 Tamás Cser

Re: Maven 3.0-alpha-5 and maven-archetype packaging

2009-12-07 Thread Stevo Slavić
Thanks, fixed, build passes in both maven 2 and 3. Regards, Stevo. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Stevo Slavić wrote: > > It seems 3.0-alpha-5 is not compatible with current 2.0-alpha-4 version of >> maven-archetype-plugin - archetype:create-from-project mojo create

Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-07 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Well, how about a "feature branch" (short lived branches)? Or you modify all the modules to have different GAV upon branch? This is kinda nonsense to me, since I branch it to do some feature that I know will get back into trunk. "Renaming" (changing GAVs of modules, maybe a LOT of them) is PITA in

Re: Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-07 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
You have the same version in 2 branches in a project ? For me it is a bad practice Each branch has it own version to avoid those sort of conflict. Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net 2009/12/7 Tamás Cservenák > Hi the

Local Repository Optimizations should be removed

2009-12-07 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi there, this is mainly about this issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4368 It caused a lot of grief (and lost hours) to me, until I figured what happens on me. IMHO, no "optimization" like this should be done against local repository. Please undo it. Thanks, ~t~

Resolving transitive dependencies in a mojo

2009-12-07 Thread Barış Erdemir
Hello, I am trying to resolve transitive dependencies of my project. I need a list of all dependencies. I am using : /** * @parameter expression="${dependencies}" default-value="${project.dependencies}" */ private ArrayList depende

Re: Maven 3.0-alpha-5 and maven-archetype packaging

2009-12-07 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Stevo Slavić wrote: It seems 3.0-alpha-5 is not compatible with current 2.0-alpha-4 version of maven-archetype-plugin - archetype:create-from-project mojo creates archetype project with packaging maven-archetype, but that packaging seems not to be supported by / valid for 3.0-alpha-5 Try runni

Maven 3.0-alpha-5 and maven-archetype packaging

2009-12-07 Thread Stevo Slavić
Hello Maven developers, It seems 3.0-alpha-5 is not compatible with current 2.0-alpha-4 version of maven-archetype-plugin - archetype:create-from-project mojo creates archetype project with packaging maven-archetype, but that packaging seems not to be supported by / valid for 3.0-alpha-5 (see this

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Assembly Plugin 2.2-beta-5

2009-12-07 Thread Grzegorz Słowikowski
See my comment http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-416?focusedCommentId=201500&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_201500 Greetings Grzegorz Slowikowski Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 7 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNot