Re: voting was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-25 Thread Stephen Connolly
2009/11/26 Paul Benedict : > I would also like to contribute my frustration with the current build > process. It's great the alpha releases are coming out often, but I > cannot possibly be testing them at the frequency you guys are > currently tagging and voting. I thought the "once a week" alpha w

Re: voting was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-25 Thread Paul Benedict
I would also like to contribute my frustration with the current build process. It's great the alpha releases are coming out often, but I cannot possibly be testing them at the frequency you guys are currently tagging and voting. I thought the "once a week" alpha was a good idea until it actually ha

Re: voting was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
Let's not beat the dead horse. No one cares. There's not good reason for not releasing something immediately if there are fixes available. That's just not the way it works here, that's fine and not a big deal. On 2009-11-25, at 7:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 26/11/2009, at 6:24 AM, Jason

Re: voting was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-25 Thread Brett Porter
On 26/11/2009, at 6:24 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > If ever we really needed to push out builds more frequently I would just do > it from Sonatype. I've given up trying to be truly agile at Apache, it's just > not going to happen. I don't understand what the issue is with the current process. Be

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Shade Plugin 1.2.2

2009-11-25 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Vincent Siveton, Jason van Zyl, Olivier Lamy +1 (non-binding): Mark Struberg, Stephen Connolly I will promote the artifacts to the central repository and continue with the release. Benjamin -

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Shade Plugin 1.2.2

2009-11-25 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2009/11/22 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > We solved 7 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&version=15525 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11540&status=1 > > Staging repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Shade Plugin 1.2.2

2009-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 2009-11-25, at 5:22 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Vote open for 72 hours. Ping Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Shade Plugin 1.2.2

2009-11-25 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 2009/11/25 Benjamin Bentmann : >> Vote open for 72 hours. > > Ping > > > Benjamin > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > --

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Shade Plugin 1.2.2

2009-11-25 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Vote open for 72 hours. Ping Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: voting was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
If ever we really needed to push out builds more frequently I would just do it from Sonatype. I've given up trying to be truly agile at Apache, it's just not going to happen. On 2009-11-25, at 2:10 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Paul Gier

voting was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-25 Thread Dan Fabulich
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Paul Gier wrote: I wonder if we really need a full vote for every alpha.  Especially if this is going to happen every two weeks.  Why not just vote for a 2 week alpha release schedule and then don't do another vote until it's time for bet

Re: Re: Need advice to get Sonar Mojo working with Maven 3.0

2009-11-25 Thread Simon Brandhof
Hi Sascha, Unfortunately no, and I can't promise you any release date. But you can vote for the issue SONAR-1265 [1] in order to increase its priority. Thank you Simon [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONAR-1265 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Sascha Scholz wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I'm ver

Re: Re: Need advice to get Sonar Mojo working with Maven 3.0

2009-11-25 Thread Sascha Scholz
Hi Simon, I'm very interested in trying out Sonar with Maven 3. Did you make any progress on this topic? Regards, Sascha Simon Brandhof wrote: > Thank you Olivier. I'll have a look at this new component. > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> Hi, >> What I can suggest i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-25 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Paul Gier wrote: > I wonder if we really need a full vote for every alpha.  Especially if this > is going to happen every two weeks.  Why not just vote for a 2 week alpha > release schedule and then don't do another vote until it's time for beta 1? The ASF require

bug report

2009-11-25 Thread Feng, Yongming
Hi Dev team, Not sure this is the right mail address for my report, since no link for the maven issue list on mail-lists page. It's a tricky problem from my perspective, as following: MS excel file couldn't be copied to target folder correctly (meaning excel file in the destination folder crashed