This is more a plan to implement the existing multi-threading patch
than an actual proposal. Imo a proposal should describe the
solution...ie how will this multi-threading work, how will it decide
what to build and in what order, etc. I think essentially the details
you Ralph and I briefly discusse
There you go, it's all yours Dan :-)
On 2009-11-14, at 8:38 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
We can give you access.
Well,
http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/
is already public.
Benjamin
-
Jason van Zyl wrote:
We can give you access.
Well,
http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/
is already public.
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For addit
On 2009-11-14, at 8:27 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Honestly there's not really any public proposal or design to look at
Got one now :-)
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Experimental+Multithreading+Support
and I really think that we should try your branch a
tom.bujok wrote:
It would be grate if somebody could give a little bit of feedback.
Sorry for not responding earlier.
I think the biggest concern here is backwards compatibility; this is a
puzzle that I don't think any of us have solved, and which blocks a LOT of
cool features we've conside
I added a patch to the MNG-3004 jira issue that fixes an additional
concurrency issue with Dan Fabulich's patch.
I am the author of a pending surefire concurrency patch (
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-555), which was one
of several patches I made to be able to run spring tests in parall
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Honestly there's not really any public proposal or design to look at
Got one now :-)
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Experimental+Multithreading+Support
and I really think that we should try your branch against the
performance framework and make sure ev
This is now an official proposal here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Experimental+Multithreading+Support
(I didn't have karma to edit this page until a few minutes ago; you might
need to request karma as well, especially since this the first proposal
in this new location.)
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
John Casey wrote:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapache-001/org/apache/apache/7/
+1
I change my vote -1 after discovering that the version of the
maven-javadoc-plugin being used by this POM, namely 2.6.1, is prone to
fail during rele
Mark Hobson wrote:
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-001/
Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plugin-2.4/
+1
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..
On 2009-11-14, at 4:47 AM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
I was waiting until alpha-3 was out to merge in the MNG-3004 branch.
MNG-3004 passes all ITs, including a few new ITs of the experimental
multithreaded mode.
Can we recut alpha-4 with MNG-3004 in it?
I'd personally still like to see a lit
+1
Hervé
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009, Mark Hobson a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> The big new feature in this release is an upgrade to Checkstyle 5.0,
> which brings Java 5 compatibility.
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127&version=15
> 336
>
> There ar
12 matches
Mail list logo
