Re: Maven 3.0: just shipping a zip

2009-10-12 Thread John Casey
Makes no big difference to me, I tend to favor the tarball formats as I mentioned above, but that's probably just because I'm used to working on *nix/OS X environments. Brian Fox wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: I personally think that not having a tar.gz will be v

Re: Release Problem: Commit failure to SVN

2009-10-12 Thread Brian Fox
This should be posted to the user list, along with an example of your pom and perhaps some mvn -x output to go with it. On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Franco Ehrat wrote: > Hi developers, > > > > I send you this mail because I'm totally irritated. I tried a few times >  to release a component.

Re: Maven 3.0: just shipping a zip

2009-10-12 Thread Brian Fox
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > I personally think that not having a tar.gz will be very "unnatural" for unix > folks and will cause a barrage of "where's the unix build?"  emails to users@ > and such. > > To me, there is no downside of having it.  It takes an extra couple

Re: Maven 3.0: just shipping a zip

2009-10-12 Thread Paul Benedict
Is it typical at Apache for .gz files to be distributed too? I know that whenever I've done releases, I have only done .zip files. Paul On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > I personally think that not having a tar.gz will be very "unnatural" for unix > folks and will cause a

Re: Maven 3.0: just shipping a zip

2009-10-12 Thread Daniel Kulp
I personally think that not having a tar.gz will be very "unnatural" for unix folks and will cause a barrage of "where's the unix build?" emails to users@ and such. To me, there is no downside of having it. It takes an extra couple seconds to build and upload. Who cares? But the po

using ojdbc to connect to oracle from Jira

2009-10-12 Thread Lisa Sheckleford
Hi, I am in the process of creating a plugin using the atlassian sdk and have just installed the ojdbc driver from oracle into my local maven repository. Now, I need to write a class that can connect to oracle for the plugin but I am not sure what my class needs to extend in terms of an atlassi

Re: Maven 3.0: just shipping a zip

2009-10-12 Thread John Casey
Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: hmm I'm using zips on a few Linux Servers, Solaris and HP-UX and had no problem so far. _Very_ old gunzip had a few problems, but I'm not sure if we have to consider them. In any case there is still the fallback to

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven source plugin version 2.1.1

2009-10-12 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Benjamin, should I fix something ? :-( For this release? No, not because of me. The stuff from target is superfluos but should not hurt, unless you discover files that reveal sensitive information. If you wanted to look into working on the underlying assembly descri

Re: Release guide outdated

2009-10-12 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Yes, Myself I didn't have issue to navigate in its screens.Thx. Arnaud On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Brian Fox wrote: > I'll get them updated, the steps are substantially the same but > screens slightly different. > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Arnaud HERITIER > wrote: > > Hi, > > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven source plugin version 2.1.1

2009-10-12 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
> +1 > > The source distro again contains target/** so we probably should look into > another assembly descriptor, something simple without regex that simply > works for single-module projects. > > Benjamin, should I fix something ? :-( Arnaud

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven source plugin version 2.1.1

2009-10-12 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-017/ Staging site: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-source-plugin-2.1.1/ +1 The source distro again contains target/** so we probably should look into another assembly descriptor, some

Re: Maven 3.0: just shipping a zip

2009-10-12 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > hmm I'm using zips on a few Linux Servers, Solaris and HP-UX and had no > problem so far. _Very_ old gunzip had a few problems, but I'm not sure if we > have to consider them. > > In any case there is still the fallback to use 'jar -x' to u

Re: Maven 3.0: just shipping a zip

2009-10-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:10 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Sorry from a german. Your argument was: "We had no problem with internal distributions." My reply is: Of course you didn't have. Internal distributions are typically used in development environments only and very rarely on productive system

Re: Maven 3.0: just shipping a zip

2009-10-12 Thread Mark Struberg
hmm I'm using zips on a few Linux Servers, Solaris and HP-UX and had no problem so far. _Very_ old gunzip had a few problems, but I'm not sure if we have to consider them. In any case there is still the fallback to use 'jar -x' to unzip a modern zip ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 10/12/09, Jaso

Re: Maven 3.0: just shipping a zip

2009-10-12 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Sorry from a german. Your argument was: "We had no problem with internal distributions." My reply is: Of course you didn't have. Internal distributions are typically used in development environments only and very rarely on productive systems. But the problems I am predicting are most likely to oc