Before moving it to apache pom, we could ask to some others projects to
validate it ?
Arnaud
# Arnaud Héritier
# Software Factory Manager
# eXo Platform
# http://www.exoplatform.com
# http://blog.aheritier.net
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> We still have some fixes to mak
I'm confused - isn't this related to the JIRA issue?
On 21/08/2009, at 1:13 PM, jdca...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jdcasey
Revision: 806646
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Aug 21 17:13:43 2009
--
---
Hi Paul,
On 20/08/2009, at 3:16 PM, pg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pgier
Date: Thu Aug 20 19:16:15 2009
New Revision: 806311
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=806311&view=rev
Log:
[SUREFIRE-502] Fixing classpath ordering for configured classes/test-
classes directories are used. Removin
We still have some fixes to make before we promote it apache wide.
Once it's working for all our stuff we can upgrade the apache pom.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> perhaps you could forward this to all PMCs ?
> Cheers,
>
> Arnaud
>
> # Arnaud Héritier
> # Software Facto
2009/8/23 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>
>> In theory, we remove things only in a major version (2.0).
>
> That's fine, so we'll call it 2.0.
In a 2.0 case, we need to sync some classes (PLXUTILS-21)
Cheers,
Vincent
---
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
In theory, we remove things only in a major version (2.0).
That's fine, so we'll call it 2.0.
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
