deploy on apache.snapshots ?

2009-08-13 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi, I'd like to migrate commons-monitoring to use the new plexus-based apache.snapshots I can login to this instance with my apache ID, but can't deploy with this setup : apache.snapshots https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots Did I missed something ? Cheer

[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

2009-08-13 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (28 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques

Re: svn commit: r803723 - /maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml

2009-08-13 Thread Brian Fox
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:57 PM, wrote: > Author: jdcasey > Date: Wed Aug 12 21:57:19 2009 > New Revision: 803723 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=803723&view=rev > Log: > Adding source-release assembly configuration. > > Modified: >    maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml > > Modified: maven/po

Re: [DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Brian Fox
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > 2009/8/13 Wendy Smoak : >> >> It would also be good to post the original document on the mailing >> list, so it will be in the archives as a basis for the discussion. >> Confluence may not be there forever, but the mailing list archives >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
2009/8/14 Benjamin Bentmann : > Stephen Connolly wrote: >> >> An alternative mechanism is to add empty methods to AbstractMojo which >> are invoked pre-reactor, pre-module, post-module and post-reactor... > > The problem I see here is that the core can't tell whether these methods are > just empty

Re: [DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Stephen Connolly wrote: To address this distinction in aggregation scope, we might start off with new mojo annotations like "@aggregator top-level|project" that plugin authors can use to indicate the desired operational mode. But it seems this ultimatively demands a new POM element to enable the

Re: [DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
2009/8/13 Benjamin Bentmann : >> [0] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Aggregator+Plugins > > 1. Background > > In Maven 2.x we have a boolean mojo annotation @aggregator with the > following effects on the mojo execution: > > Execution >  For mojos executed directly from the CLI, the mojo wil

Re: [DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Wendy Smoak wrote: It would also be good to post the original document on the mailing list, so it will be in the archives as a basis for the discussion. Right, quoting would be easier if the content is handy, silly me. Benjamin ---

Re: [DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
[0] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Aggregator+Plugins 1. Background In Maven 2.x we have a boolean mojo annotation @aggregator with the following effects on the mojo execution: Execution For mojos executed directly from the CLI, the mojo will only be executed once and not per each

Re: [DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
2009/8/13 Wendy Smoak : > > It would also be good to post the original document on the mailing > list, so it will be in the archives as a basis for the discussion. > Confluence may not be there forever, but the mailing list archives > will be. > > -- > Wendy > Here's the document so 1. Backg

Re: [DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Stephen Connolly wrote: > >> Do you want comments on this thread or on the wiki? > > Good question. Personally, I could imagine keeping the discussion on the > mailing list is easier to follow, this linear comment listing in Confluence >

Re: [DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Stephen Connolly wrote: Do you want comments on this thread or on the wiki? Good question. Personally, I could imagine keeping the discussion on the mailing list is easier to follow, this linear comment listing in Confluence doesn't look like being up to a threaded discussion. So I suggest

Re: [DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
Benjamin, Do you want comments on this thread or on the wiki? -Stephen 2009/8/13 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > with a new major release of Maven hopefully not far away, we might also want > to review aggregator plugins. I tried to get some inspirations from existing > proposals and put some furt

[DISCUSS] Aggregator Plugins

2009-08-13 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, with a new major release of Maven hopefully not far away, we might also want to review aggregator plugins. I tried to get some inspirations from existing proposals and put some further thoughts about this in the wiki [0] and would like to know what you think. Are the presented use cases v

Re: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-13 Thread Brian Fox
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > John, > > What's the range of features across the two http Wagon's right now? > Currently the lightweight impl handles NTLMv2 and does a better job caching the data when the repository asks for authentication (this one uses Sun code). The Sun

Re: Skipping ant tasks on mvn package

2009-08-13 Thread Chinnij2ee
I found the option in maven-antrun-plugin version 1.2 Chinnij2ee wrote: > > Hi, > I would like to know how to skip executing ant script on mvn package > > my pom.xml looks like > > > > > org.apache.maven.plugins > maven-antru

Skipping ant tasks on mvn package

2009-08-13 Thread Chinnij2ee
Hi, I would like to know how to skip executing ant script on mvn package my pom.xml looks like org.apache.maven.plugins maven-antrun-plugin test

Re: What's up with http://maven.apache.org/pom.html

2009-08-13 Thread Brett Porter
republished and seems fine (still to sync). Not sure what happened last time... On 13/08/2009, at 4:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I pushed it recently to fix an error I found, didn't notice anything when it built. Will check again. On 13/08/2009, at 3:57 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: Arnaud

Re: What's up with http://maven.apache.org/pom.html

2009-08-13 Thread Brett Porter
I pushed it recently to fix an error I found, didn't notice anything when it built. Will check again. On 13/08/2009, at 3:57 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: Arnaud Herritier has confirmed that he is seeing an empty page too... also http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.1.0/maven-model/maven.html 2009/

What's up with http://maven.apache.org/pom.html

2009-08-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
I am just getting a blank page for the pom reference at http://maven.apache.org/pom.html I can see other pages, e.g. http://maven.apache.org/settings.html I have checked through two different network paths (work and my 3G UTMS connection) Did something go wrong during the 2.2.1 release? -Stephe

Re: What's up with http://maven.apache.org/pom.html

2009-08-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
Arnaud Herritier has confirmed that he is seeing an empty page too... also http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.1.0/maven-model/maven.html 2009/8/13 Stephen Connolly > I am just getting a blank page for the pom reference at > http://maven.apache.org/pom.html > > I can see other pages, e.g. http://mave