RE: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Jason Chaffee
Yeah, I got that more as I read more of the threads. Nonetheless, I thought it might be valuable to hear from a couple of users that were just talking about being about to use different implementations. Thanks for the info though. Jason -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:jv

Re: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 12-Aug-09, at 5:37 PM, Jason Chaffee wrote: It was just yesterday that I was just have a conversation with a former colleague about wagon issues in 2.x and the difficulty in switching out implementations. He was running into all kinds of issues trying to do it and was not very happy abo

Re: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 12-Aug-09, at 5:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 12/08/2009, at 8:14 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Also I think this is a function of not being able to specify the wagon implementation via URL properly in 2.x. So we'll just find a more normal way to plug in an implementation properly as the co

Re: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 12-Aug-09, at 5:27 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 12/08/2009, at 8:10 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 12-Aug-09, at 3:43 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 12/08/2009, at 5:58 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: John, Not John, but I like to think I do a good impression :) What's the range of features ac

RE: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Jason Chaffee
It was just yesterday that I was just have a conversation with a former colleague about wagon issues in 2.x and the difficulty in switching out implementations. He was running into all kinds of issues trying to do it and was not very happy about it. Also, this is something I have mentioned on

Re: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Brett Porter
On 12/08/2009, at 8:14 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Also I think this is a function of not being able to specify the wagon implementation via URL properly in 2.x. So we'll just find a more normal way to plug in an implementation properly as the core in 3.x is fully dynamic and can load compone

Re: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Brett Porter
On 12/08/2009, at 8:10 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 12-Aug-09, at 3:43 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 12/08/2009, at 5:58 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: John, Not John, but I like to think I do a good impression :) What's the range of features across the two http Wagon's right now? They reall

Re: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 12-Aug-09, at 3:43 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 12/08/2009, at 5:58 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: John, Not John, but I like to think I do a good impression :) What's the range of features across the two http Wagon's right now? They really don't do anything more than the underlying httpcl

Re: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 12-Aug-09, at 3:43 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 12/08/2009, at 5:58 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: John, Not John, but I like to think I do a good impression :) What's the range of features across the two http Wagon's right now? They really don't do anything more than the underlying httpcl

Re: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 12-Aug-09, at 3:43 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 12/08/2009, at 5:58 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: John, Not John, but I like to think I do a good impression :) What's the range of features across the two http Wagon's right now? They really don't do anything more than the underlying httpcl

Re: svn commit: r803723 - /maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml

2009-08-12 Thread John Casey
We need to release these, and then we should be ready to take out all the per-project source-release descriptors. -john Jason van Zyl wrote: Sweet, now we can eliminate the duplication the temporarily proliferated in the Maven POMs? On 12-Aug-09, at 2:57 PM, jdca...@apache.org wrote: Autho

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Jarsigner Plugin 1.1

2009-08-12 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2009/8/9 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > We solved 2 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=15512&styleName=Html&projectId=11990 > > There are no issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11990&status=1 > > Stagi

Re: Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Brett Porter
On 12/08/2009, at 5:58 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: John, Not John, but I like to think I do a good impression :) What's the range of features across the two http Wagon's right now? They really don't do anything more than the underlying httpclient / JDK implementations. HTTP Headers, conne

Re: svn commit: r803723 - /maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml

2009-08-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
Sweet, now we can eliminate the duplication the temporarily proliferated in the Maven POMs? On 12-Aug-09, at 2:57 PM, jdca...@apache.org wrote: Author: jdcasey Date: Wed Aug 12 21:57:19 2009 New Revision: 803723 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=803723&view=rev Log: Adding source-release

Replacing old Wagons in Maven 3.0 with the Jetty-client based Wagon

2009-08-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
John, What's the range of features across the two http Wagon's right now? I assume in some cases we need the functionality of one versus the other so I would just like to improve the Jetty-client based Wagon and fix up what's required there, add any functionality and toss the other two. I

[DISCUSS] Add new mojo annotation @requiresDependencyCollection

2009-08-12 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, for Maven 3.x, I would like to discuss the introduction of a new mojo annotation @requiresDependencyCollection As the name probably suggests, the intended effect is to resemble an invocation of the artifact collector, i.e. calculate the dependency tree but don't try to resolve the a

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Jarsigner Plugin 1.1

2009-08-12 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Vote open for 72 hours. Ping Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [RESULT] Commit access for Mark Struberg

2009-08-12 Thread Brett Porter
I went ahead and updated authz. On 03/08/2009, at 1:54 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Ok, I count the following +1 votes: Brett, Benjamin, Lukas, Brian, Olivier, Rahul, Jason, Arnaud, Hervé, John and Dennis and no negative votes so the vote passes. Welcome, Mark! Jason, would you mind updating a

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 2.2.1 Released

2009-08-12 Thread John Casey
It's been fixed, thanks to hboutemy. I redeployed the site last night. Paul Benedict wrote: The release notes are messed up. I am running Firefox 3.5 and all the issues are within one paragraph. On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:46 PM, John Casey wrote: The Maven team is pleased to announce the rel

Re: maven2 question from an end user

2009-08-12 Thread Brian Fox
Here's what I got from the Selenium team: The user is simply confused: http://nexus.openqa.org/content/repositories/releases/org/seleniumhq/selenium/server/selenium-server/1.0.1/ What he wants is the "standalone" jar which contains all the dependencies rolled up in it: http://nexus.openqa.org/co

Re: maven2 question from an end user

2009-08-12 Thread Brian Fox
Tell him to email repo-maintain...@maven.apache.org. The ibiblio copy seems to match what is in the central repository so this isn't an ibiblio issue. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Don Sizemore wrote: > >  Hello, > >  We received the following question in our help queue today: > > From: roopa.n

maven2 question from an end user

2009-08-12 Thread Don Sizemore
Hello, We received the following question in our help queue today: From: roopa.n...@gmail.com Hi, I am trying to download the selenium-server-1.0.1.jar from maven2 repository (/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/seleniumhq/selenium/server/selenium-server/1.0.1) It was a 5.6MB file earlier. Now it