[RESULT] [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Arnaud, Benjamin, Brett, Lukas, Vincent, Wendy +1 (non binding): Nicolas I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Thanks! -Lukas Lukas Theussl wrote: Hi, We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the s

Re: svn commit: r787433 - /maven/site/trunk/src/site/apt/guides/mini/guide-http-settings.apt

On 23/06/2009, at 8:56 AM, jdca...@apache.org wrote: Author: jdcasey Date: Mon Jun 22 22:56:25 2009 New Revision: 787433 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=787433&view=rev Log: Adding documentation for (proposed) new httpclient-based wagon configuration. Added: maven/site/trunk/src/s

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Fourth Attempt)

On 29/06/2009, at 3:01 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: John Casey wrote: We've solved 28 issues for this release: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&styleName=Html&version=15103 The release history seems a little confusing. For instance, MNG-3538 was listed but

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Fourth Attempt)

Will the release notes contain any general justification for an upgrade? For example, can it highlight the major improvements between 2.1 and 2.2? or 2.0 and 2.2? On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > John Casey wrote: > >> We've solved 28 issues for this release: >> >> >> h

proposal for cleaning up 2.x series releases / trees

With the 2.2.0 release coming up, I've started to find the amount of merging (and consistency of it) is becoming harder, and I think it might be inevitable that there'll be confusion from users about what release is the right one to use. I'd like to suggest the following: - remove the 2.1.1

Re: svn commit: r784555 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.1.x/maven-core/pom.xml

Hi Benjamin, Unfortunately this broke the build on my machine (maybe because of a difference in working copy version?). Also, it doesn't appear to have been merged to the other branches. I think perhaps we should change the activation so that this is only included on release, or if requested (say

Re: [VOTE] Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6

+1, with notes: On 26/06/2009, at 5:49 AM, John Casey wrote: You can find the binaries here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-011/ I built and tested the source release. In the future, I think DEPENDENCIES should be excluded as it is inaccurate (I've made th

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

+1 Cheers, Arnaud # Arnaud Héritier # http://blog.aheritier.net On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > +1 > > > On 25/06/2009, at 6:52 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the sandbox: >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

+1 On 25/06/2009, at 6:52 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote: Hi, We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the sandbox: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11932&styleName=Html&version=15118 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/s

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Fourth Attempt)

John Casey wrote: We've solved 28 issues for this release: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&styleName=Html&version=15103 The release history seems a little confusing. For instance, MNG-3538 was listed but actually duplicates an unresolved issue. I think dups

Re: Maven group membership?

Hi Brian, Thanks for the reply. So what is the difference between the sonatype oss nexus and the apache nexus? Should apache projects stick to the apache one? We'll be releasing apache (incubating) empire-db. Cheers, Francis On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > I'm still confused