Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Lukas Theussl
Wendy Smoak wrote: Thanks for doing this, this is one thing I've really missed from Maven 1. And thanks for starting with 1.0 instead of -alpha or -beta. :) I'd like to stress that this was a very conscious decision! :) -Lukas --

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Third Attempt)

2009-06-25 Thread Stephen Connolly
Hey, you're doing great work pulling the quality of Maven releases up... no need to apologise -Stephen 2009/6/26 John Casey : > I really can't believe I'm doing this, but I upgraded plexus-utils to get > rid of a process leak and then re-rolled this staged release...without > remembering that we

[CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Third Attempt)

2009-06-25 Thread John Casey
I really can't believe I'm doing this, but I upgraded plexus-utils to get rid of a process leak and then re-rolled this staged release...without remembering that we had a similar issue in plexus-interpolation. I need to reopen MNG-4219 and upgrade plexus-interpolation to handle this problem,

[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

2009-06-25 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (28 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Third Attempt)

2009-06-25 Thread John Casey
I've redeployed the staging repository for this vote: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-013/ The binary distro and source-release artifact are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-013/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.0/ This red

Re: svn commit: r788542 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.2.0-RC/pom.xml

2009-06-25 Thread John Casey
Done, and modified. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4219 -john Brett Porter wrote: This is a reasonably major change given how far p-u's tentacles reach in Maven, can you create a JIRA issue for it and update the log message? Thanks, Brett On 26/06/2009, at 8:49 AM, jdca...@apache.org wr

Re: svn commit: r788542 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.2.0-RC/pom.xml

2009-06-25 Thread Brett Porter
This is a reasonably major change given how far p-u's tentacles reach in Maven, can you create a JIRA issue for it and update the log message? Thanks, Brett On 26/06/2009, at 8:49 AM, jdca...@apache.org wrote: Author: jdcasey Date: Thu Jun 25 22:49:44 2009 New Revision: 788542 URL: http://s

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Third Attempt)

2009-06-25 Thread John Casey
It looks like the mavenVersion property didn't get updated properly for this staged release. I'll republish with a new repository, and send along that link. First, I'm dropping the staging repository mentioned below, to keep people from getting confused. -john John Casey wrote: Hi, I'm open

[VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Third Attempt)

2009-06-25 Thread John Casey
Hi, I'm opening yet another new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4213 See also the documentation improvements listing below for more information on docs related to this issue. [NOTE] this release is contingent upon the successful release of Maven Wagon

[VOTE] Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6

2009-06-25 Thread John Casey
Hi, I'd like to call a vote for the release of Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6. I've opted not to shoot for a 1.0 release here, since there are still something like four outstanding issues of various intricacy open for the 1.0 release, and I wanted to get several important bugs fixed for the Maven 2.2

Re: User's project-specific properties ability disabled after MNG-4060

2009-06-25 Thread Robert Scholte
I didn't say it's not possible without profiles.xml, but without it you have to make a choice between the best of the worst. Let's stick to the passwords. You don't want to expose them in the pom.xml, right? But what if project A en project B both have a ${password} in their pom.xml, from the sett

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Lukas Theussl wrote: Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-009/ +1, despite a test failure when building the source distro on JDK 1.5+ from a base directory with a space in its path: Caused by: org.apache.maven.doxia.docrenderer.DocumentRendererExcep

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Vincent Siveton
2009/6/25 Wendy Smoak : > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > >> +1 -- we've been using it for the Continuum site for a while.  I >> tested the 1.0 version and it works fine [1]. > > ... oops, I think we need to have a source distribution as well.  I > know Brian was working on au

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Vincent Siveton
2009/6/25 Wendy Smoak : > Thanks for doing this, this is one thing I've really missed from Maven > 1.  And thanks for starting with 1.0 instead of -alpha or -beta. :) Hehe! we are so sure that you will like it that we dont need alpha/beta ;) FYI it is used in ASF Shindig too... so yes I think it i

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > +1 -- we've been using it for the Continuum site for a while.  I > tested the 1.0 version and it works fine [1]. ... oops, I think we need to have a source distribution as well. I know Brian was working on automating that, but maybe it can ju

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote: > We solved 11 issues since the [PDF] plugin was promoted from the sandbox: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11932&styleName=Html&version=15118 +1 -- we've been using it for the Continuum site for a while. I tested

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC4 & Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6

2009-06-25 Thread Brian Fox
Nice. That's an old bug that I saw back in ~2.0.5 but it comes and goes. This is some core plexus threading issue that isn't specific to this release. Search jira for that message On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi John, > > John Casey wrote at Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009

Re: site plugin [was: Re: svn commit: r764090 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site/SiteStageDeployMojo.java]

2009-06-25 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Dennis, 2009/4/28 Dennis Lundberg : > Let me do a 2.0.1 release of the stuff that is in trunk, before we make > the switch to Doxia 1.1. Doxia 1.1.1 has been released and I plan to release the site plugin 2.1 soon. I see 2 options: - wait for the 2.0.1 release (do you plan it soon?) - create a

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Vincent Siveton
2009/6/25 nicolas de loof : > any chance you create a maven-msword-plugin now ? :) No msword but rtf could be *really* easy to implement: - fo sink with a new convertFoToRtf method (some lines) - create a FoRtfRenderer based on FoPdfRenderer (mainly extends) - create a new rtf-plugin based on the

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2009/6/25 Lukas Theussl : > > Hi, > > We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the sandbox: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11932&styleName=Html&version=15118 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secu

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Lukas Theussl
nope it's there, only sync is pending... you can check by setting temporarily 140.211.11.10:80 as your HTTP proxy -Lukas nicolas de loof wrote: Link to the staging site is wrong, it has been deployed on http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-pdf-plugin/

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread nicolas de loof
Link to the staging site is wrong, it has been deployed on http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-pdf-plugin/ Cheers, Nicolas 2009/6/25 Lukas Theussl > > Hi, > > We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the sandbox: > > http://jira

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Lukas Theussl
ms? word? never heard... ;) -Lukas nicolas de loof wrote: +1 nice work ! any chance you create a maven-msword-plugin now ? :) 2009/6/25 Lukas Theussl Hi, We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the sandbox: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11932

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 nice work ! any chance you create a maven-msword-plugin now ? :) 2009/6/25 Lukas Theussl > > Hi, > > We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the sandbox: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11932&styleName=Html&version=15118 > > There are still a cou

[VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread Lukas Theussl
Hi, We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the sandbox: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11932&styleName=Html&version=15118 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11932&status=

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC4 & Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6

2009-06-25 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi John, John Casey wrote at Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009 02:03: > Hi everyone, > > As I'm sure you're aware, I've tried twice now to get a clean vote done > for Maven 2.2.0. In each case, we've run into blocking bugs that have > caused me to retract the vote and fix the code. > > Well, with the lat