Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0

2009-06-15 Thread Brett Porter
On 16/06/2009, at 4:37 PM, Andrei Solntsev wrote: Hi, Have you seen this post about recent release of maven-eclipse-plugin? http://twasink.net/blog/2009/06/this-is-why-maven-gives-me-the-shits/ Guys are a little bit frustrated saying " Why, Maven developers? Why? Why are you releasing any ne

RE: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0

2009-06-15 Thread Andrei Solntsev
Hi, Have you seen this post about recent release of maven-eclipse-plugin? http://twasink.net/blog/2009/06/this-is-why-maven-gives-me-the-shits/ Guys are a little bit frustrated saying " Why, Maven developers? Why? Why are you releasing any new versions yet? ... there is no excuse for this. " An

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0

2009-06-15 Thread Reinhard Nägele
+1 [non-binding] John Casey schrieb: Hi, Okay, it looks like there haven't been many problems with the latest RC of Maven 2.2.0. So, I'd like to put it up for a vote. We've solved 23 issues for this release: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&styleName=Html&ve

RE: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0

2009-06-15 Thread Steve Ariantaj
+1 [non-binding] -Original Message- From: John Casey [mailto:jdca...@commonjava.org] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:30 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 Hi, Okay, it looks like there haven't been many problems with the latest RC of Maven 2.2.0. So, I'd like to put

[VOTE] Maven 2.2.0

2009-06-15 Thread John Casey
Hi, Okay, it looks like there haven't been many problems with the latest RC of Maven 2.2.0. So, I'd like to put it up for a vote. We've solved 23 issues for this release: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&styleName=Html&version=15103 You can download the source

Re: svn commit: r783525 - /maven/components/trunk/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/DefaultArtifactFilterManager.java

2009-06-15 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 15-Jun-09, at 2:14 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote: Why is it a problem that doxia is "not really and independent project used by anyone"? Does doxia have any different status than, say, wagon, surefire, archetype...? I think these are all in the same boat and all a bit of a problem actuall

Re: Update on ASF Release requirements

2009-06-15 Thread John Casey
This particular assembly descriptor is a one-time case for the assembly plugin only. It's not the one that Brian was talking about, since that one will have to be much more generalized to handle the variability of other projects. In this case, I know that the build directory for the assembly pl

Re: svn commit: r783525 - /maven/components/trunk/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/DefaultArtifactFilterManager.java

2009-06-15 Thread Lukas Theussl
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 15-Jun-09, at 10:29 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On 11-Jun-09, at 8:53 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote: Hi Olivier, How does this relate to MNG-3402? This doesn't relate to anything in 3.x because it's not going to be an issue because no doxia classes

Re: svn commit: r783525 - /maven/components/trunk/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/DefaultArtifactFilterManager.java

2009-06-15 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 15-Jun-09, at 10:29 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On 11-Jun-09, at 8:53 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote: Hi Olivier, How does this relate to MNG-3402? This doesn't relate to anything in 3.x because it's not going to be an issue because no doxia classes will be distributed wi

Re: svn commit: r783525 - /maven/components/trunk/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/DefaultArtifactFilterManager.java

2009-06-15 Thread Lukas Theussl
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 11-Jun-09, at 8:53 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote: Hi Olivier, How does this relate to MNG-3402? This doesn't relate to anything in 3.x because it's not going to be an issue because no doxia classes will be distributed with 3.x. Not sure what you guys are planning for