Re: Bouncy Castle Jars

2009-06-06 Thread Carlos Sanchez
You'd have to go through the Maven repository upload process described in http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Tim Pizey wrote: > Hi, > > I have asked the Bouncy Castle guys if they will push to a Maven Repository > and they > r

Bouncy Castle Jars

2009-06-06 Thread Tim Pizey
Hi, I have asked the Bouncy Castle guys if they will push to a Maven Repository and they replied that they publish only to http://www.bouncycastle.org/latest_releases.html So could someone at the Maven end ensure that all those jars are synched with? thanks Tim -- We are in dialogue.

Re: about MCOMPILER-80 (set compiler default to 1.5)

2009-06-06 Thread nicolas de loof
2009/6/6 Brian Fox > On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 8:28 AM, nicolas de loof >wrote: > > > Could we also : > > - set 2.0.9+ as maven version prerequisite in a compiler 2.1 branch, so > > that > > any user running an older maven version (and may use this 2.1 plugin from > > LATEST rule) would be warned e

Re: about MCOMPILER-80 (set compiler default to 1.5)

2009-06-06 Thread Brian Fox
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 8:28 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > Could we also : > - set 2.0.9+ as maven version prerequisite in a compiler 2.1 branch, so > that > any user running an older maven version (and may use this 2.1 plugin from > LATEST rule) would be warned early during the build and not when d

Re: about MCOMPILER-80 (set compiler default to 1.5)

2009-06-06 Thread nicolas de loof
Could we also : - set 2.0.9+ as maven version prerequisite in a compiler 2.1 branch, so that any user running an older maven version (and may use this 2.1 plugin from LATEST rule) would be warned early during the build and not when deploying its app on a Java 1.4 runtime. - set java 5 as plugin ru

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Java 5 and Maven Plugins

2009-06-06 Thread nicolas de loof
2009/6/6 Dennis Lundberg > Here are the results of this vote. It was somewhat difficult to > summarize as some of the voters replied +1 to someone else's vote and > others voted on more than one option. Maybe you can count my vote a 0.5 for [A] and 0.5 for [B] ;) > Feel free to correct my > i

[VOTE][RESULT] Java 5 and Maven Plugins

2009-06-06 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Here are the results of this vote. It was somewhat difficult to summarize as some of the voters replied +1 to someone else's vote and others voted on more than one option. Feel free to correct my interpretations below. [A] Nicolas [B] Nicolas, Brian (my interpretation of what he wrote), Brett, M

Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2009-06-06 Thread Julia Antonova
I will be out of the office starting 06.06.2009 and will not return until 09.06.2009. I have no acces to my mailbox, I will reply to your message upon return. For urgent issues please contact my colleagues: Elena Tonoyan / Administration - elen...@tumlare.com Daria Ignatieva / Administration -

Re: [VOTE] Java 5 and Maven Plugins

2009-06-06 Thread Dennis Lundberg
I vote for B. Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > Recent discussions about the Checkstyle Plugin has raised the question > of requiring Java 5 in Maven Plugins. > > We will IIUC require Java 5 for Maven 2.2. So when do we start using it > in our plugins? > > [A] We start using it across the board f