Re: Progress on support for large projects

Ralph Goers schrieb: > On May 13, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Christian Schulte wrote: > >> Ralph Goers schrieb: >>> So the tree really looks like: >>> >>> +tags >>> +root-1.0 (trunk revision 1) >>> +A(1.0) >>> +B(1.0) >>> +root-1.1 (trunk revision 2) >>> +A(1.0) >>> +B(1.1) >>> +root-

Re: Progress on support for large projects

On May 13, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Christian Schulte wrote: Ralph Goers schrieb: So the tree really looks like: +tags +root-1.0 (trunk revision 1) +A(1.0) +B(1.0) +root-1.1 (trunk revision 2) +A(1.0) +B(1.1) +root-1.2 (trunk revision 3) +A(1.0) +B(1.2) /trunk at revisi

Re: Progress on support for large projects

Ralph Goers schrieb: > So the tree really looks like: > > +tags >+root-1.0 (trunk revision 1) > +A(1.0) > +B(1.0) >+root-1.1 (trunk revision 2) > +A(1.0) > +B(1.1) >+root-1.2 (trunk revision 3) > +A(1.0) > +B(1.2) > /trunk at revision 4 >+root(1.2-SNAP

Re: Progress on support for large projects

On May 13, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On May 13, 2009, at 10:41 AM, David Jencks wrote: Sorry I wasn't more specific last night at 2:00 am :-). I need more scm context to understand. I'm assuming something like svn with +tags +root-1.0 (1.0) +A(1.0) \B(1.0) +root-1.1 (1.

Re: Progress on support for large projects

On May 13, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: Okay. So thats what I guessed when I said that the MavenProject/ Model is just a stupid POJO and various plugins manipulate it with side effects. Sounds a little hacky to me but thats the way it is. So my serialization idea is nuts thou

Re: Progress on support for large projects

On May 13, 2009, at 10:41 AM, David Jencks wrote: Sorry I wasn't more specific last night at 2:00 am :-). I need more scm context to understand. I'm assuming something like svn with +tags +root-1.0 (1.0) +A(1.0) \B(1.0) +root-1.1 (1.1) +A(1.0) \B(1.1) \root-1.2 (1.1) +A(

Re: Progress on support for large projects

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ralph, > > I've been "promised" by Jason that the work on Maven 3 is going to fix > some of these issues. I simply haven't had the time to look at the work > on Maven 3 and even if I had, it has been changing at a fairly rapid > pace for months. >

Re: Progress on support for large projects

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Milos, > >> mvn eclipse:eclipse does perform a build (partially) and might even produce >> 1 eclipse project for multiple maven projects (correct me if I'm wrong) No it does not. But I hope it will one finest day. And it will definitely do NOT co

Re: Progress on support for large projects

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, > [cut.] > > Sorry I wasn't more specific last night at 2:00 am :-). I need more scm > context to understand. I'm assuming something like svn with > > +tags > +root-1.0 (1.0) > +A(1.0) > \B(1.0) > +root-1.1 (1.1) > +A(1.0

Re: Progress on support for large projects

On May 13, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: On May 13, 2009, at 12:53 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'm even more mystified and understand how you want to use scm even less. One of the basic principles I have for scm is that stuff shouldn't be duplicated, in the sense that if some artifa

Re: Progress on support for large projects

On May 13, 2009, at 12:53 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'm even more mystified and understand how you want to use scm even less. One of the basic principles I have for scm is that stuff shouldn't be duplicated, in the sense that if some artifact is released at version 1.2.3.4 say, the scm lo

vote for maven-ejb-plugin 2.2 release

Hi developers I was wondering if there is a schedule for the maven-ejb-plugin 2.2 release? All issues are closed since month, none has been created and our project is waiting for an official release to solve one of the issues fixed in the 2.2 SNAPSHOT version. thanks Michael Michael Hinter

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC2

Hi John, I just came across that same issue as reported before: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@maven.apache.org/msg80592.html There is no conclusion in this thread (apart from that it works with maven 2.1, which I verified) and I haven't found a jira, did I miss it or should I open one? -L

Checkstyle plugin - upgrade to checkstyle 5 ?

Hi You may have noticed discussion on user list about checkstyle plugin to upgrade to checkstyle 5. (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-105) Such upgrade would require Java5 as plugin runtime. What's the best option here ? - upgrade maven-

Re: Progress on support for large projects

On May 12, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On May 12, 2009, at 6:20 PM, David Jencks wrote: On May 12, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On May 12, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Brian Fox wrote: As I already said, I talked about release-plugin and my view of the world and it seems NOT