what is the current state of trunk?

2009-05-09 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, Can someone clear up what the current state of trunk, particularly in regard to the MNG-2766 branch where all the work is happening at the moment? Is everything from trunk in there now, or are there two streams of dev? I thought I had seen that it was about to be merged but activity h

Re: Progress on support for large projects

2009-05-09 Thread Brian Fox
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi there, > > absolutely everybody having large maven projects is > annoyed by maintaining the versions in all the poms. > Are you using the release plugin? > > Additionally the complete

Re: maven 2.1 incompatibility list

2009-05-09 Thread Brian Fox
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi there, > > I found that there is a little list of incompatibilities form m2.1 at: > > http://maven.apache.org/release-notes.html > > However there are a lot more. > > E.g. with maven 2.0

Re: maven 2.1 incompatibility list

2009-05-09 Thread Fernando Nasser
These sound more like bugs to me - Original Message - From: "Joerg Hohwiller" To: "Maven Developers List" Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2009 4:48:40 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: maven 2.1 incompatibility list -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I found tha

Progress on support for large projects

2009-05-09 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, absolutely everybody having large maven projects is annoyed by maintaining the versions in all the poms. Additionally the complete solution is quite simple and seems to be quite common sense: 1. Allow to omitt versions in as well as in t

maven 2.1 incompatibility list

2009-05-09 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I found that there is a little list of incompatibilities form m2.1 at: http://maven.apache.org/release-notes.html However there are a lot more. E.g. with maven 2.0.x you could have a module included in your toplevel pom that you also add

Re: [maven-scm] Argument validation in maven-scm

2009-05-09 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 9-May-09, at 6:10 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi! In maven-scm, I saw a lot of if (blablubParameter == null { throw new NullPointerException("blablubParameter must not be null!") } Shouldn't we use commons.lang.Validate -1 Validate.notNull(blablubParameter, "blablubParameter must not

Re: get rid of scm and wagon sublists

2009-05-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
doxia ml too ? -- Olivier 2009/5/9 Olivier Lamy : > +1 > -- > Olivier > > 2009/5/8 Brian Fox : >> There seems to be hardly any traffic on these lists and it tends to cause >> questions to be unanswered. I think we should ditch these lists and just use >> maven-dev for these areas. Any objections?

Re: [maven-scm] Argument validation in maven-scm

2009-05-09 Thread Mark Struberg
> -0, to pull in another dependency just for something that is trivial to > code by hand. We could also add the small validation class I already wrote for JGit [1]. We could easily put them into plexus-utils which we already use excessively. Licensed under ASL for sure. LieGrue, strub [1] http

Re: [maven-scm] Argument validation in maven-scm

2009-05-09 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Mark Struberg wrote: Shouldn't we use commons.lang.Validate Validate.notNull(blablubParameter, "blablubParameter must not be null!"); or at least throw InvalidArgumentExceptions instead of NPE? +1, to throw IAE instead of NPEs. The former one gives a clearer indication which party (client v

[maven-scm] Argument validation in maven-scm

2009-05-09 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! In maven-scm, I saw a lot of if (blablubParameter == null { throw new NullPointerException("blablubParameter must not be null!") } Shouldn't we use commons.lang.Validate Validate.notNull(blablubParameter, "blablubParameter must not be null!"); or at least throw InvalidArgumentExceptio

FWD: how to treat Exceptions in ScmResults?

2009-05-09 Thread Mark Struberg
Oki, once again, now on maven-dev ;) After talking to a few people on IRC, it seems that the error handling in maven-scm could be made a bit more easier. Currently there are 2 ways for a scm provider to 'report' that there has been something wrong in executing a SCM command (e..g. 'svn up') 1

Re: get rid of scm and wagon sublists

2009-05-09 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brian Fox wrote: I think we should ditch these lists and just use maven-dev for these areas. +1 Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: get rid of scm and wagon sublists

2009-05-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 -- Olivier 2009/5/8 Brian Fox : > There seems to be hardly any traffic on these lists and it tends to cause > questions to be unanswered. I think we should ditch these lists and just use > maven-dev for these areas. Any objections? >