Re: SHA

2009-05-05 Thread Brett Porter
For artifact checksums? They are not a security measure, so I don't think increasing their length is of benefit. Having read the same mail I'm guessing you did, it made me reflect and we probably should have kept using md5 for efficiency TBH. Cheers, Brett On 06/05/2009, at 4:11 PM, Robert

SHA

2009-05-05 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
just a heads up that maven may need to switch from SHA1 to SHA512 (or higher). not sure how difficult that will be. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mav

Re: svn commit: r771907 - in /maven/ant-tasks/branches/maven-ant-tasks-2.0.x/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/ant/AbstractArtifactWithRepositoryTask.java site/apt/reference.apt test/java/org/a

2009-05-05 Thread Paul Gier
Ok, it's done. Thanks for the suggestions! Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi Paul, Author: pgier Date: Tue May 5 16:34:00 2009 New Revision: 771907 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=771907&view=rev Log: [MANTTASKS-142] Improve default remote repository id. Added: maven/ant-tasks/branches

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC2

2009-05-05 Thread Brian Fox
What options are being passed to the release invocation? It's using -f which seems to be invalid. Paul MERLIN wrote: Hey, I had no issue building my projects. release:prepare is working but release:perform is not (see the trace below). I switched to 2.1.0 right after that and the release:perfo

Re: Can system locale change release:prepare behavior ?

2009-05-05 Thread Paul MERLIN
Thanks, I've tried with a svn:// url without any problem (releasing & branching). /Paul Le mardi 05 mai 2009 11:41:15, Olivier Lamy a écrit : > Hi, > There is an implementation of svn only in java (using svnkit) which is > available here [1]. > > You can use that with adding a dependency in the

Re: WARNING: Maven 2.1 and GPG plugin interaction problems.....

2009-05-05 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tue May 5 2009 7:47:04 am Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is just a warning that the Maven team has just discovered an > > interaction problem between Maven 2.1 and the maven-gpg-plugin that CAN > > result in the signatures for the installed/deployed poms being invalid.

Re: svn commit: r771907 - in /maven/ant-tasks/branches/maven-ant-tasks-2.0.x/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/ant/AbstractArtifactWithRepositoryTask.java site/apt/reference.apt test/java/org/a

2009-05-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi Paul, Author: pgier Date: Tue May 5 16:34:00 2009 New Revision: 771907 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=771907&view=rev Log: [MANTTASKS-142] Improve default remote repository id. Added: maven/ant-tasks/branches/maven-ant-tasks-2.0.x/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/ant/Pom

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC2

2009-05-05 Thread Paul MERLIN
Hey, I had no issue building my projects. release:prepare is working but release:perform is not (see the trace below). I switched to 2.1.0 right after that and the release:perform went well. I'm using the javasvn scm provider here but I get the same error using the native one. /Paul p...@dosa

DefaultMavenProjectBuilder throws NPE

2009-05-05 Thread Amarnath Palavalli
Hello, I am using the Maven Project jar 2.1.0. I get the following exception when I use it: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at org .apache .maven.project.ProjectUtils.buildArtifactRepository(ProjectUtils.java: 115) at org .apache .maven .project.ProjectUtil

Re: Critical bugs pending on Maven clean plugin

2009-05-05 Thread Brian Fox
Fair enough. I personally don't have the bandwidth to look into this again now (i'm already looking at some release, assembly, and gpg issues that are blockers). The last time I checked I wasn't able to reproduce it. If someone wants to supply a patch with tests, then I can apply it. Bouiaw wr

Re: AW: Update on ASF Release requirements

2009-05-05 Thread Brian Fox
Mark Struberg wrote: Hi Brian! I've added a new flag to the Assembly plugin that will tell the plugin to only run in the Execution Root folder and skip everything else. I'm not sure if this solution will work. I know of a few projects using the assembly plugin in submodules for oth

Re: WARNING: Maven 2.1 and GPG plugin interaction problems.....

2009-05-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Daniel Kulp wrote: This is just a warning that the Maven team has just discovered an interaction problem between Maven 2.1 and the maven-gpg-plugin that CAN result in the signatures for the installed/deployed poms being invalid. Signatures for the other artifacts (jars, wars, etc..) are unaf

Re: Critical bugs pending on Maven clean plugin

2009-05-05 Thread Bouiaw
Symlinks are needed by some frameworks we use and that need some shared directories between several webapp. /home was just a sample, in our case we have symlink to a share /DATA repository. When you run mvn clean and that you loose all your /DATA (many gigabytes of data), I can say you that you fe

Re: Can system locale change release:prepare behavior ?

2009-05-05 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, There is an implementation of svn only in java (using svnkit) which is available here [1]. You can use that with adding a dependency in the maven-release-plugin : com.google.code.maven-scm-provider-svnjava maven-scm-provider-svnjava 1.4 I have tested this with cha

Re: Can system locale change release:prepare behavior ?

2009-05-05 Thread Grzegorz S?owikowski
Maven parses scm output. I don't remember details, but I've had the same problem. My solution was permanent setting LC_MESSAGES to "C". Greetings Grzegorz Slowikowski Paul MERLIN wrote: Hey, I'm facing weird problems with the maven-release-plugin and friends. I use maven-release-plugin-2.0-

Re: Critical bugs pending on Maven clean plugin

2009-05-05 Thread Paul MERLIN
Le mardi 05 mai 2009 00:12:55, Brian Fox a écrit : > Why would you have a symlink in your target folder to someplace important? Here is a quick example that came to my mind : Imagine you package a tarball containing such a symlink and that during the build you have to extract it to change somethi

AW: Update on ASF Release requirements

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi Brian! > I've added a new flag to the Assembly plugin that will tell the > plugin to only run in the Execution Root folder and skip everything else. I'm not sure if this solution will work. I know of a few projects using the assembly plugin in submodules for other things than distribution.s