On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> No, there's no reason to stop it.We'll publish a 1.6.1 in few days if
> necessary
Except the current vote count :)
+1 (binding):
aherit...@gmail.com
+1 (non binding):
belling...@gmail.com
nicolas.del...@gmail.com
baerr...@gmail.c
No, there's no reason to stop it.We'll publish a 1.6.1 in few days if
necessary
Arnaud
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Brian E. Fox
> wrote:
> > Has this vote been officially cancelled?
>
> No, why?
>
> There is definitely a defect intr
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> Has this vote been officially cancelled?
No, why?
There is definitely a defect introduced with setting inclusions to
**/*.java (MECLIPSE-443 added inclusions) for Apsect developers (see
MECLIPSE-538).
But that shouldn't stop the release.
I
Has this vote been officially cancelled?
-Original Message-
From: Julien HENRY [mailto:henr...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 11:27 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Maven eclipse plugin version 2.6
Done:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-53
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (28 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
EclipsePlugin extends AbstractIdeSupportMojo
AbstractIdeSupportMojo extends AbstractMojo implements LogEnabled
AbstractMojo has getLog()
LogEnabled has enableLogging()
Which logger should be used?
getLog() from AbstractMojo
or
the logger passed in via enableLogging()
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:12 AM, John Casey wrote:
> This is probably not a well-documented feature yet, as it's fairly new and
> we've been working out the kinks. Container-descriptor handlers aggregate
> content from things like components.xml, etc. in an intelligent way, rather
> than allowing
Hi All,
It's been awhile since I've had the availability to do any Maven work, but
I'd like to get back into it. I have a few open JIRA issues, and I figure
MNG-3038 is as good a place to start as any.
I notice that the first comment states that the issue will likely not be
fixed for 2.0.x, and
Agree completely. Just thought it was not the world's best job name
for what seems to be a new tool. Eventually all the good words in the
dictionary are taken, so duplication is normal, but it was simply the
Gmail "sponsored link" that made me aware of it. I bet this company is
benefiting nicely fr
Hi
I wonder if there is any way to "configure" m2eclipse settings using
dedicated meta-datas in the POM,
for example I'd like to set a custom "Goals to invoke after project clean".
I can change the m2eclipse settings by hand, but I'd like to configure it in
the POM as
foo (or maybe a shorter
n
This is probably not a well-documented feature yet, as it's fairly new
and we've been working out the kinks. Container-descriptor handlers
aggregate content from things like components.xml, etc. in an
intelligent way, rather than allowing one jar's descriptor to overwrite
another's. The descrip
It looks like a hardware tracking / provisioning tool not a build system.
Shrug. Not related to Apache Maven at all it appears to me.
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Fay [mailto:wayne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:19 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Maven Enterprise
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
Rémy Sanlaville wrote:
Otherwise three possible improvements:
1. Why it's a (build) plugin and not a report plugin ?
I have no strong opinion for or against either but I guess we'll have to pin
it down for the first re
13 matches
Mail list logo
