+2
Emmanuel
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release maven-scm 1.2 and maven-release-plugin 2.0-beta-9.
> This two release are in only one vote because they are very dependant
> due to a fix for people using subversion version > 1.5.0.
>
> Concerning mav
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> Does anyone else use xmlbeans in their projects?
> Could they check that generated sources get added to the classpath correctly.
>
> I'm noticing that they aren't.
> I'm not sure if that is a regression or a problem my end.
>
I'll take tha
Does anyone else use xmlbeans in their projects?
Could they check that generated sources get added to the classpath correctly.
I'm noticing that they aren't.
I'm not sure if that is a regression or a problem my end.
-
To unsubscr
I think I can set aside some time later this week/early next week to
work through patches for the plugin and any issues important for the
next release.
Raphaël, do you have any time to sync up on this?
Cheers,
Brett
On 24/03/2009, at 11:59 AM, djrobo wrote:
My team is also badly in need
The enforcer uses this to hand components over to the rules via a get
Component method (it implements the expressionevaluator interface). I
would probably need to convert all the rules over to actual plexus
components to use injection.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:jvan...
My team is also badly in need of the new archetype plugin to be released.
Clearly development on the archetype plugin has been put on the back-burner
lately, but it would be nice if the current fixes could be made available in
the mean time.
Jason Voegele wrote:
>
> We have a few archetypes th
+2
On 23-Mar-09, at 5:15 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
+2
Arnaud
2009/3/23 Olivier Lamy
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-scm 1.2 and maven-release-plugin 2.0-
beta-9.
This two release are in only one vote because they are very dependant
due to a fix for people using subversion version > 1.5.0.
On 23-Mar-09, at 5:24 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/03/2009, at 11:15 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I assume that means "we can use this internally, but don't use it
from plugins".
You won't need it internally either, and I currently don't see use
of session.lookup( x|y ) in the core.
I
On 24/03/2009, at 11:15 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I assume that means "we can use this internally, but don't use it
from plugins".
You won't need it internally either, and I currently don't see use
of session.lookup( x|y ) in the core.
I was thinking of in 2.1, but actually it's probabl
On 23-Mar-09, at 5:02 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
+1, so you'll add the deprecation to maven-2.1.x?
If no one has a problem with it, yes.
I assume that means "we can use this internally, but don't use it
from plugins".
You won't need it internally either, and I currently don't see use of
+2
Arnaud
2009/3/23 Olivier Lamy
> Hi,
> I'd like to release maven-scm 1.2 and maven-release-plugin 2.0-beta-9.
> This two release are in only one vote because they are very dependant
> due to a fix for people using subversion version > 1.5.0.
>
> Concerning maven-scm :
> We solved 36 issues:
>
+1
Arnaud
2009/3/24 Barrie Treloar
> Hi,
>
> We solved 35 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14163&styleName=Html&projectId=11133
>
> There remaining issues left in JIRA:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11133&status=1
>
>
Hi,
We solved 35 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14163&styleName=Html&projectId=11133
There remaining issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11133&status=1
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/reposi
You will only see the issue if the repository is accessed by http or https
if you access the repository by svn or svn+ssh you will not see the issue.
Further it is reported (At least I saw on the subversion list) that if you
use dav_serf and not dav_neon you will not see this issue either.
(The
+1, so you'll add the deprecation to maven-2.1.x?
I assume that means "we can use this internally, but don't use it from
plugins".
- Brett
On 24/03/2009, at 10:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I would like to remove the MavenSession.lookup( class|role ) methods
in Maven 3.x so I would li
Hi,
I would like to remove the MavenSession.lookup( class|role ) methods
in Maven 3.x so I would like to start deprecating them and prefer
injecting anything required using a javadoc annotation (current plugin
api) and an annotation (the new plugin api).
General access to the container is
+1 (non binding)
I successfully did a full release cycle to a git repo.
LieGrue and gn8,
strub
--- Olivier Lamy schrieb am Mo, 23.3.2009:
> Von: Olivier Lamy
> Betreff: [VOTE] Release Maven Scm 1.2 and maven-release-plugin 2.0-beta-9
> An: "Maven Developers List" , scm-...@maven.apache.org
>
fyi, just tested and same issue.
OUF I don't try a release for nothing :-)).
--
Olivier
2009/3/24 Dan Tran :
> it means the work around for svn 1.5 issue is not needed ? :-)
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> argh :-)
>> Just tested the release plugin (and the changelog)
A little out of topic (but not so much), I'm working on providing a
maven-scm javasvn provider [1] (due to license issue it's not anymore
in asf repository) and it works fine to cut release, changelog etc...
--
Olivier
[1] http://code.google.com/p/maven-scm-provider-svnjava/
2009/3/24 Jason Chaff
it means the work around for svn 1.5 issue is not needed ? :-)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> argh :-)
> Just tested the release plugin (and the changelog) with svn 1.6.0 and
> this scm release with success (on cygwin/windows).
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2009/3/24 Jason Chaffee
Good to hear. :)
-Original Message-
From: oliver.l...@gmail.com [mailto:oliver.l...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Olivier
Lamy
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 4:39 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Scm 1.2 and maven-release-plugin 2.0-beta-9
argh :-)
Just tested the
argh :-)
Just tested the release plugin (and the changelog) with svn 1.6.0 and
this scm release with success (on cygwin/windows).
--
Olivier
2009/3/24 Jason Chaffee :
> Subversion 1.6.0 was just released at the end of last week. Not sure if it
> has been tested against 1.6.0 or not, but I have
Subversion 1.6.0 was just released at the end of last week. Not sure if it has
been tested against 1.6.0 or not, but I have already ran into issues with other
software and Subversion 1.6.0just for your info. :)
-Original Message-
From: oliver.l...@gmail.com [mailto:oliver.l...@gma
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-scm 1.2 and maven-release-plugin 2.0-beta-9.
This two release are in only one vote because they are very dependant
due to a fix for people using subversion version > 1.5.0.
Concerning maven-scm :
We solved 36 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?ve
2009/3/23 Barrie Treloar
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> > Hi,
> > A very famous issue ! http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-375
> >
> > My next days jobs will be releasing maven-scm and release-plugin :-))
>
> yes i saw that but didn't click that running the below
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> A very famous issue ! http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-375
>
> My next days jobs will be releasing maven-scm and release-plugin :-))
yes i saw that but didn't click that running the below command with
1.5.6 was hanging becuase
We have a few archetypes that rely on features of the new maven-archetype-
plugin version 2.0-alpha-4. In fact, right now these archetypes only work
using a locally patched version of maven-archetype-plugin. Our patch (for
ARCHETYPE-110) has already been applied to maven-archetype in trunk, but
Sounds a good idea.
I will be on irc ~21H PM (Paris Time).
Thanks in advance for your help,
--
Olivier
2009/3/23 Jason van Zyl :
> You can stage maven scm and the release plugin if you want people to try
> them together. I can help you with that if you like. We can make it easy for
> people to tes
2009/3/23 Jason van Zyl :
> I can just release it with the current version no?
No the fix for svn 1.5.0+ requires a scm 1.2 !
>
> When are you going to release scm?
Tonigth (note : I'm on GMT timezone :-) ) .
>
> On 23-Mar-09, at 9:00 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> this need a maven-scm release befor
You can stage maven scm and the release plugin if you want people to
try them together. I can help you with that if you like. We can make
it easy for people to test by pointing at particular nexus group which
will pull in both tools staged together so it's used in the same way
it would be w
I can just release it with the current version no?
When are you going to release scm?
On 23-Mar-09, at 9:00 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
this need a maven-scm release before.
It's on my todo list.
--
Olivier
2009/3/23 Jason van Zyl :
I'm going to stage the release plugin tonight.
On 23-Mar-09,
release means staging first :-)
2009/3/23 Mark Struberg :
>
> Any staging out there I can run a quick test with?
> Snapshot works for me so far (but didn't used it for releasing)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- Olivier Lamy schrieb am Mo, 23.3.2009:
>
>> Von: Olivier Lamy
>> Betreff: release maven-
Good works Oliver, looking forward to the release
Thanks
-D
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> Any staging out there I can run a quick test with?
> Snapshot works for me so far (but didn't used it for releasing)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- Olivier Lamy schrieb am Mo, 23
Any staging out there I can run a quick test with?
Snapshot works for me so far (but didn't used it for releasing)
LieGrue,
strub
--- Olivier Lamy schrieb am Mo, 23.3.2009:
> Von: Olivier Lamy
> Betreff: release maven-scm
> An: scm-...@maven.apache.org, "Maven Developers List"
> Datum: Monta
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-scm 1.2.
No objections ?
It's mandatory to release maven-release-plugin (and the famous issue
with svn > 1.5.0)
Thanks,
--
Olivier
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For addit
this need a maven-scm release before.
It's on my todo list.
--
Olivier
2009/3/23 Jason van Zyl :
> I'm going to stage the release plugin tonight.
>
> On 23-Mar-09, at 6:07 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> A very famous issue ! http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-375
>>
>> My next days job
I'm going to stage the release plugin tonight.
On 23-Mar-09, at 6:07 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
A very famous issue ! http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-375
My next days jobs will be releasing maven-scm and release-plugin :-))
--
Olivier
2009/3/23 Barrie Treloar :
http://maven.apache
Hi,
A very famous issue ! http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-375
My next days jobs will be releasing maven-scm and release-plugin :-))
--
Olivier
2009/3/23 Barrie Treloar :
> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
>
> Step 6. Verify the Staged artifacts
>
> Indicates tha
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
Step 6. Verify the Staged artifacts
Indicates that if I dont like the contents I can drop the repository
and rollback the release.
If I then try release:prepare again I get a failure:
[INFO] Working directory: D:\ide\maven\maven-eclipse-
39 matches
Mail list logo
