+1 I tested briefly against 2.0.x build with various values of parallel
downloads and everything seems ok.
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:07 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] Maven 2.1.0
+1
Arnaud
On Fr
+1
Arnaud
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> +1
>
> Vincent
>
> 2009/3/18 John Casey :
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
> >
> > You can try the binaries here:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
> > (
> https://repository.apach
+1
Vincent
2009/3/18 John Casey :
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>
> You can try the binaries here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-511ea882714d8b/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.1.0/)
>
I renamed the version 2.0.x in JIRA to 2.1.x since it seems clear that
we won't be continuing that stream much further, and because it's a
reversible action if anyone objects.
After 2.1.0 is done, I'd still like to look at releasing 2.0.11 with
just the fixes that were already completed and
Anyone know where the work that John did for custom profile activators
[1] ended up? I assume it's now destined for 3.0.
[1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Custom+Profile+Activators
Cheers,
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
+1, been using it for a few days and done some releasing too.
Mark
2009/3/20 Lukas Theussl :
>
> +1
>
> -Lukas
>
>
> John Casey wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>>
>> You can try the binaries here:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
>>
>> (http
only maven-scm-provider-svnjava
--
Olivier
2009/3/20 Jason van Zyl :
> That's an old fork of svnkit, not sure you want to put it there. That
> project is essentially dead.
>
> On 20-Mar-09, at 1:46 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Not in mojo but here : http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/svn
That's an old fork of svnkit, not sure you want to put it there. That
project is essentially dead.
On 20-Mar-09, at 1:46 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
Not in mojo but here : http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/svn4j ?
a new path : https://svn.codehaus.org/svn4j/maven-scm-provider-
svnjava/
+1
-Lukas
John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
You can try the binaries here:
http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-511ea882714d8b/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.1.0/)
We've resolv
+1
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> +1
>
> On 19/03/2009, at 11:12 AM, John Casey wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>>
>> You can try the binaries here:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/maven
Hello.
Suppose I'm running a Junit test with Maven, and I need to get all the files
in the classpath, for various reasons.
Is there any way to access the Maven project and get it's classpath? (I
presume I can't just use @parameter & co).
Thank you,
Costin.
--
View this message in context:
htt
Okay I found the answer my self.
The Installer reads the extension is from
getProject().getArtifact().getArtifactHandler().getExtension()
And DefaultArtifactHandler implementes the code
public String getExtension()
{
if ( extension == null )
{
extension =
On 20/03/2009, at 6:55 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
It is missing the -sources JAR for the GWT project before it.
But this is a little weird...
1) built in the same directory, the sources JAR is added to the
classpath list, as is the main one
2) built in the reactor, it is not added to the class
Christian, have you tried to mark your dependency as 'optional' [1]?
LieGrue,
strug
[1]
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-optional-and-excludes-dependencies.html
--- Christian Edward Gruber schrieb am Fr,
20.3.2009:
> Von: Christian Edward Gruber
> Betreff: Re: S
+1
On 19/03/2009, at 11:12 AM, John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
You can try the binaries here:
http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-511ea882714d8b/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.1.0
I would use "provided" which implies that the target runtime will
provide this if needed. It's not needed, but the semantic should
work. "Provided" scoped dependencies are not transitively added to
packaging lifecycles like war and ear.
Also, this is probably a maven-users question, not a
Hi There
packaging
jar makes a .jar file,
war a .war file,
ear a .ear file,
etc.
So it would be simple to day that the file extension == packaging
But that is not the case for maven-plugin it still produces a .jar
file
I want to make a packaging=citem that produces a .tar.gz
Until now
Hey,
Please, deploy a snapshot of the nsis-maven-plugin into the codehaus snapshots
repository.
/Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Luciano Resende
Date: 2009/3/19
Subject: [GSoC 2009] Apache is officially participating in Google
Summer of Code 2009
To: p...@apache.org
Dear PMC,
It's now official, Google has announced that The Apache Software
Foundation was selected as one
You'd need to use animal sniffer to ensure that you're not using 1.5 or 1.6
only methods (e.g. String.isEmpty(), etc)
2009/3/20 Barrie Treloar
> I vaguely remember that 1.4 should be used but I can't find anything
> on Committer Environment or Committer Settings.
>
> Does that mean the compiler
Paul Benedict wrote:
> Is there a way to bring in a library only for compiling without making
> it part of the runtime (i.e., war dependency) or using transitive
> exclusions? Java 5 has source-level annotations and sometimes a
> dependency is only for compiling and has no runtime dependency. Is a
I vaguely remember that 1.4 should be used but I can't find anything
on Committer Environment or Committer Settings.
Does that mean the compiler settings configured in the parent poms is
good enough?
My machine recently went boom so I have re-installed and I only have
JDK 1.6.0_11.
-
Hi,
The message says that maven can´t find in its default repositories the jars
for 2 artifacts:
1)opensaml:opensaml:jar:1.1
2)bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15:jar:132
To have a look if the artifacts you're looking for exist in the default
maven repositories or if you have the correct groupId, artifact
Hi,
Not in mojo but here : http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/svn4j ?
a new path : https://svn.codehaus.org/svn4j/maven-scm-provider-svnjava/
--
Olivier
2009/3/20 Brett Porter :
>
> On 20/03/2009, at 2:17 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> So the Brett proposal looks fine too.
>> I can mark the svn
+1
Works fine on my "how can it be so complex ?" project
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> 2009/3/19 John Casey
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
> >
> > You can try the binaries here:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
>
2009/3/19 John Casey
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>
> You can try the binaries here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
> (
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-511ea882714d8b/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.1.0/
> )
>
> We'v
+1 Corporate builds with custom plugins are working fine
Thanks!
S.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:12 AM, John Casey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>
> You can try the binaries here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
> (
> https://repository.apache.or
On 20/03/2009, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 20/03/2009, at 1:36 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 19/03/2009, at 8:03 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
It's failing for XWiki's build...
Are you still running XWiki's build on your hudson ci btw?
It's failing with the gwt maven plugin.
It works f
28 matches
Mail list logo
