+1
builds all my projects without error
On 18-Mar-09, at 5:12 PM, John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
You can try the binaries here:
http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-511ea882714d8b
On 20/03/2009, at 1:36 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 19/03/2009, at 8:03 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
It's failing for XWiki's build...
Are you still running XWiki's build on your hudson ci btw?
It's failing with the gwt maven plugin.
It works fine with 2.1.0-M1 though. Ping me if you need help
On Thu March 19 2009 7:45:53 pm John Casey wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> I'm still trying to get XWiki's dependencies to resolve out on
> grid.sonatype.org...the latest missing dependency is:
>
> com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl:jar:2.1.10
>
> I was wondering whether this is supposed to be available in one of
Dear all,
I am a very novice user of maven
I am trying to create a dummy project using IONA FUSE.
When I am trying to use the "mvn install" command it is ending up in the
following error. When I manually try to down load the artifact the sites
does not respond to it .
Please find the log
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Is there a way to bring in a library only for compiling without making
> it part of the runtime (i.e., war dependency) or using transitive
> exclusions? Java 5 has source-level annotations and sometimes a
> dependency is only for compiling an
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (28 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
On 19/03/2009, at 8:03 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
It's failing for XWiki's build...
Are you still running XWiki's build on your hudson ci btw?
It's failing with the gwt maven plugin.
It works fine with 2.1.0-M1 though. Ping me if you need help to
reproduce it.
Can we get the error mess
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Is there a way to bring in a library only for compiling without making
it part of the runtime (i.e., war dependency) or using transitive
exclusions? Java 5 has source-level annotations and sometimes a
dependency is only for compiling and has no runtime dependency. Is a
new scope needed for this?
P
That's my guess. Hervé?
On 20/03/2009, at 10:47 AM, John Casey wrote:
I haven't added anything that might change it; I'm sort of assuming
it's something the new modello was adding...isn't it?
-j
Brett Porter wrote:
Hmm, why was this added? We don't use a validating parser, and
nobody real
I haven't added anything that might change it; I'm sort of assuming it's
something the new modello was adding...isn't it?
-j
Brett Porter wrote:
Hmm, why was this added? We don't use a validating parser, and nobody
really edits them by hand. With network traffic on these files at a
premium fo
Hi Vincent,
I'm still trying to get XWiki's dependencies to resolve out on
grid.sonatype.org...the latest missing dependency is:
com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl:jar:2.1.10
I was wondering whether this is supposed to be available in one of the
xwiki repositories, or if you have it installed somewh
Hmm, why was this added? We don't use a validating parser, and nobody
really edits them by hand. With network traffic on these files at a
premium for downloads I would think it's best left out to save some
bytes.
(I don't consider it a blocker to the vote though, and with regard to
my vot
*sigh* I'll make sure it's deployed.
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
John Casey wrote:
It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
I noticed that the maven-metadata*.xml files generated by 2.1.0 include
the schema location and point at
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/metadata-1.0.0.xsd
which i
+1 (Great Job)
Thanks!!
--
Olivier
2009/3/19 John Casey :
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>
> You can try the binaries here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-511ea882714d8b/org/apache/mave
John Casey wrote:
It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
I noticed that the maven-metadata*.xml files generated by 2.1.0 include
the schema location and point at
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/metadata-1.0.0.xsd
which is currently non-existent. I assume this XSD will be deployed onc
non-binding +4 ;-), having used all RCs and this version without any problem
on a large inhouse project.
John Casey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>
> You can try the binaries here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
>
(https://repository.apache.o
+1
Hervé
Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, John Casey a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>
> You can try the binaries here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-511ea8827
>14d8b/org/apache/maven/a
Hi all,
Cactus, Cargo builds fine.
+1 from me.
Cheers, Petar.
2009/3/19 Anders Kristian Andersen
> +1
> I have build my current applications with it with success.
> /Anders
>
>
> On 19/03/2009, at 01.12, John Casey wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>>
>> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
+1
I have build my current applications with it with success.
/Anders
On 19/03/2009, at 01.12, John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
You can try the binaries here:
http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
John Casey wrote:
It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
+1, thanks John!
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1, works fine for me
John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
You can try the binaries here:
http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-511ea882714d8b/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.1.0/)
We'
Used it for todays work, including with M2Eclipse.
+1 (Non-binding)
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:12 AM, John Casey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>
> You can try the binaries here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
> (https://repository.apache.org/co
I'm still waiting for the XWiki build to run on the grid, but here is
the result for the gwt-maven-plugin...it was successful:
https://grid.sonatype.org/ci/view/Community%20Test%20Projects/job/gwt-maven-plugin/5/jdk=1.5,label=ubuntu/console
Is there something I'm missing? The version of Maven I
So the Brett proposal looks fine too.
I can mark the svnjava provider as optionnal and explain why on the
scm site and explain how to use it.
--
Olivier
2009/3/19 Jason van Zyl :
> From my experience asking anyone about anything legal has never been
> resolved in any timely manner.
>
> Whether gra
Jason,
2009/3/19 Jason van Zyl :
> One annotation is for Plexus components specifically and that is
> @plexus.requirement or @Requirement if you're doing annotations.
>
> The other is specifically for Maven plugins. The component metadata for your
> own types, like our Maven plugins, have their ow
+1, seems to work fine for me. Nice job.
Dan
On Wed March 18 2009 8:12:00 pm John Casey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>
> You can try the binaries here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/mav
One annotation is for Plexus components specifically and that is
@plexus.requirement or @Requirement if you're doing annotations.
The other is specifically for Maven plugins. The component metadata
for your own types, like our Maven plugins, have their own component
descriptors which are mu
From my experience asking anyone about anything legal has never been
resolved in any timely manner.
Whether grand fathered or anything else. Discussions have gone on for
a very long time.
Olivier if you want to release it then I would just taking it to mojo
and then there are no issues.
Hello,
I'm a bit confused on the use of the @component and
@plexus.requirement Javadoc annotations.
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Deterministic+Lifecycle+Planning
The above document contains the following: "injected either as a
@plexus.requirement or @component annotation, depending on
Done:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPDF
Cheers,
-Lukas
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:35 AM, jevica.arianne
wrote:
Hi!
I have tried the maven-pdf-plugin and I've encountered some bugs. Where can
I file those?
You can use http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSANDBOX in the
m
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:35 AM, jevica.arianne
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have tried the maven-pdf-plugin and I've encountered some bugs. Where can
> I file those?
You can use http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSANDBOX in the
maven-pdf-plugin component for now.
It was recently promoted from the sandbox,
Hi!
I have tried the maven-pdf-plugin and I've encountered some bugs. Where
can I file those?
--
Thanks,
Jevica Arianne B. Zurbano
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1
looks good! Tested with my Apache projects + a few internal projects.
LieGrue,
strub
--- John Casey schrieb am Do, 19.3.2009:
> Von: John Casey
> Betreff: [vote] Maven 2.1.0
> An: "Maven Developers List"
> Datum: Donnerstag, 19. März 2009, 1:12
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1
Hmm, did not work...
How can unsubscribe from this list?
Sorry for that...
Regards,
Christian
It's failing for XWiki's build...
Are you still running XWiki's build on your hudson ci btw?
It's failing with the gwt maven plugin.
It works fine with 2.1.0-M1 though. Ping me if you need help to
reproduce it.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Mar 19, 2009, at 1:12 AM, John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
unsubscribe
Yeahhh, let's go!
+1!
:-)
- Fabrice
belling...@apache.org
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:12 AM, John Casey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>
> You can try the binaries here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
> (
> https://repository.apache.org/content
On 19-Mar-09, at 1:25 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
Ok. It's was not really clear for me.
Technically we are not redistributing anything and we can ask the
board for clarification because in the strictest sense we do not
redistribute. But I think folks here would interpret a dependency in
Hi,
Ok. It's was not really clear for me.
Thanks for clarification,
--
Olivier
2009/3/19 Jason van Zyl :
> If the license is not one that the ASF accepts then we can't really dodge
> the issue by saying that it's only in the POM.
>
> On 18-Mar-09, at 5:22 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> As we
+1
Le jeudi 19 mars 2009 01:12:00, John Casey a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
>
> You can try the binaries here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-511ea8827
>14d8b/org/apache/mave
41 matches
Mail list logo
