oh right. thx for this warning. I'll wait few days to see if we can release
new parents.
Arnaud
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
> You will need to change the distmgt to match the new parent poms or wait
> for those to be staged(I'm waiting for svn to be back up to finish all t
You will need to change the distmgt to match the new parent poms or
wait for those to be staged(I'm waiting for svn to be back up to
finish all the plugin updates)
--Brian (mobile)
On Feb 16, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Arnaud HERITIER
wrote:
Without any other comments, I'll launch the release
I have it on my todo to integrate mercury into the dependency plugin.
Most of the shared component will be superceded by mercury. It's too
early to say if the Interface will change or not
--Brian (mobile)
On Feb 16, 2009, at 5:54 PM, pi song wrote:
I have just noticed that Maven3 is on t
Without any other comments, I'll launch the release as is.
Arnaud
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> Did you test the last SNAPSHOT ?
> Barrie can we launch the release process ?
>
> Arnaud
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:24 PM, djeanprost wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Jud
I have just noticed that Maven3 is on the way. The new dependency resolver
really looks very interesting. Just curious how would that affect
maven-shared/maven-dependency-tree. Will this API stay the same or be
replaced?
Pi Song
When using a shared assembly descriptor the ${artifact.id} and ${project.id}
properties are set to the shared assembly descriptor values and NOT to the
values of the executing project.
Tested on:
Assembly plugin: 2.2-beta-3 and 2.2-beta-2.
Maven: 2.0.9, 2.0.10, M2Eclipse Embedded
JDK: Sun 1
Cool, just wondering.
On 16/02/2009, at 7:39 PM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Brett Porter
wrote:
Is it stable? Maybe just move straight on to 2.1 and bump out the
rest to
2.2?
It's stable but there are a couple of things that need to be fixed
that were
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Is it stable? Maybe just move straight on to 2.1 and bump out the rest to
> 2.2?
It's stable but there are a couple of things that need to be fixed that were
introduced in 2.1 such as the caching system. We can call it 2.1 but
2.1-beta-1 s
