I assume you've tried it with 2.1? If all the same integration tests
pass then I don't see any downside.
On 15-Feb-09, at 5:52 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
I'll try to get a summary of release notes for 1.0 [1]
bugfixes:
- MODELLO-152: Strict parsing mode doesn't detect missing root element
- MO
I upgraded Archiva trunk to Modello 1.0. We use it extensively for
defining our database model and I've seen no problems with 1.0.
James
On 16/02/2009, at 10:46 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
I'm fine with that, I'd say go ahead and merge the changes across.
It's easy enough to roll back if there
Is it stable? Maybe just move straight on to 2.1 and bump out the rest
to 2.2?
- Brett
On 16/02/2009, at 3:56 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
I'd say beta-1 is fine.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg
wrote:
I'm looking at releasing a new version of Maven WAR
I'm fine with that, I'd say go ahead and merge the changes across.
It's easy enough to roll back if there are any problems.
- Brett
On 16/02/2009, at 12:15 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and Benjamin
used it
to integrate generics in r744572
Vote results:
Binding: +10 -- Brian, Jason, Olivier, John, Arnaud, Ben, Vincent,
Stephane, Herve, Brett
Non Binding: +4 -- Raphael, Oleg, Henry, Mark
The vote is successful, I will promote the artifacts and produce the
release notes and setup the distribution.
-Original Message-
From: Br
I'll try to get a summary of release notes for 1.0 [1]
bugfixes:
- MODELLO-152: Strict parsing mode doesn't detect missing root element
- MODELLO-153: Default value doesn't work for attributes
- MODELLO-154: xsd plugin does not honour xml.associationTagName
enhancements:
- MODELLO-155: support $v
All set
-Original Message-
From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr]
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 10:47 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: karma on grid.sonatype.org
I used to have karma on ci.sonatype.org to read and modify project
configuration.
Can someone give me karma
What benefits in 2.1 would we get by upgrading?
-Original Message-
From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr]
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 11:15 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and Ben
I'd say beta-1 is fine.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> I'm looking at releasing a new version of Maven WAR Plugin. The POM
> currently has 2.1-beta-1-SNAPSHOT as the version, but JIRA [1] has 2.1.
> I probably won't fix all the remaining issues in JIRA
On 15-Feb-09, at 11:15 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and Benjamin
used it
to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
I actually want to use 1.0.1 because of the changes that Igor made to
support incremental builders in Eclipse. So I'l
I'm looking at releasing a new version of Maven WAR Plugin. The POM
currently has 2.1-beta-1-SNAPSHOT as the version, but JIRA [1] has 2.1.
I probably won't fix all the remaining issues in JIRA set for this
version, since I don't yet have the necessary knowledge about the plugin.
Which version sho
Looks right to me. He switched some poms to use a different parent,
and then (I presume) shuffled the repository items to allow resolution
of that new parent artifact. No?
Christian
On 15-Feb-09, at 10:10 , Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Brian, could you write a better message describing this co
Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and Benjamin used it
to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can be done on
models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for 2.1.x
branch: I'm pretty confi
I used to have karma on ci.sonatype.org to read and modify project
configuration.
Can someone give me karma on grid.sonatype.org?
Thanks,
Hervé
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands,
Brian, could you write a better message describing this commit. The
current message doesn't seem to be correct.
bri...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: brianf
> Date: Fri Feb 13 23:43:06 2009
> New Revision: 744288
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=744288&view=rev
> Log:
> use the new parent
>
Nope it's just another one of the bugtraq options that can take a regex.
Been a few years since I looked at it so I don't recall the exact
setting.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 9:48 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subje
I wasn't aware that you could use it as a reminder. Would that require
some pre-commit hooks to work?
Brian E. Fox wrote:
> You can regexp the comment to make sure every comment has an issue in
> it, and you can tweak the dialog so it has a prompt for the issue.
> Otherwise it doesn't do much else
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>> I would like to start using bugtraq [1] in our subversion repositories.
>> If we set a bunch of svn properties in the repository, then version
>> control tools can link to issues in JIRA.
>
> +1.
>
> Will it automatically parse [MNG-] or
Thanks for the effort, in the name of the whole developemnt team and
contributors.
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 15 février 2009, ogusa...@apache.org a écrit :
> Author: ogusakov
> Date: Sun Feb 15 07:50:53 2009
> New Revision: 744623
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=744623&view=rev
> Log
19 matches
Mail list logo
