Re: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-5

2009-02-13 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 Arnaud On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > -- > Olivier > > 2009/2/13 Jesse McConnell : > > +1! > > > > -- > > jesse mcconnell > > jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Brian E. Fox > wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> -Original Messa

Re: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-5

2009-02-13 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 -- Olivier 2009/2/13 Jesse McConnell : > +1! > > -- > jesse mcconnell > jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Brian E. Fox > wrote: >> +1 >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Oleg Gusakov [mailto:oleg.subscripti...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 11,

Re: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-5

2009-02-13 Thread Jesse McConnell
+1! -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: Oleg Gusakov [mailto:oleg.subscripti...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:58 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Rele

Re: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-5 - please vote

2009-02-13 Thread Oleg Gusakov
Guys, Need one more vote! I understand that nobody is using Mercury yet, so it's hard to yay or nay when project is still in alpha stage.. Thanks, Oleg Brian E. Fox wrote: +1 -Original Message- From: Oleg Gusakov [mailto:oleg.subscripti...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11,

RE: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-5

2009-02-13 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 -Original Message- From: Oleg Gusakov [mailto:oleg.subscripti...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:58 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-5 Hi, Main reason for this release - bug fixes. A lot of testing done on the repository side, I

Re: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-5

2009-02-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 11-Feb-09, at 12:58 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote: Hi, Main reason for this release - bug fixes. A lot of testing done on the repository side, IT coverage on repository components is 60-70 % We solved 11 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MERCURY/fixforversion/14955 Staging repo: http

maven-release-plugin: apply patches for MRELEASE-294 and MRELEASE-389?

2009-02-13 Thread De Smet Ringo
Hello, I would like to start a discussion to get the patches of issues MRELEASE-294 and MRELEASE-389 applied. Can the responsible persons for maven-release-manager and maven-release-plugin review the patches and comment on any issues they see with the provided patches? http://jira.codehaus.o

Re: Docu about maven-archiver wrong, how to change?

2009-02-13 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Thomas Schoepf wrote: > The docu at > http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/examples/classpath.html#Custom > lists examples how to configure a customClasspathLayout. The examples use > ${artifact} > If one follows that, the manifest will have "null" i

Docu about maven-archiver wrong, how to change?

2009-02-13 Thread Thomas Schoepf
Hi, I'm not sure I'm posting this to the correct place... there's many lists out there. If I'm wrong, please point me to the right one. The docu at http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/examples/classpath.html#Custom lists examples how to configure a customClasspathLayout. The examples

Re: [vote] release maven 2.0.10

2009-02-13 Thread Mark Hobson
+1 Been using it for a couple of days with no probs. Mark 2009/2/12 Stephane Nicoll : > +1 > > Works fine on the company builds. > > S. > > Brian E. Fox wrote: >> >>> It's finally time after 8 Release Candidates: >>> >>> >>> Issues fixed: >>> >>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?