Re: Need Help From Maven configuration

2009-02-12 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
or even start with http://maven.apache.org/users/index.html and http://maven.apache.org/articles.html regards, Hervé Le vendredi 13 février 2009, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > please read http://maven.apache.org/users/getting-help.html > > Le vendredi 13 février 2009, SRINIVASA RAO a écrit : > > Hi

Re: Need Help From Maven configuration

2009-02-12 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
please read http://maven.apache.org/users/getting-help.html Le vendredi 13 février 2009, SRINIVASA RAO a écrit : > Hi All, > > I am new to Maven and have been asked to set up new development environment > in my office.Till now we are using CVS on one of the remote servers and web > server(TOMCAT 5

[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

2009-02-12 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (28 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques

RE: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion repository

2009-02-12 Thread Brian E. Fox
You can regexp the comment to make sure every comment has an issue in it, and you can tweak the dialog so it has a prompt for the issue. Otherwise it doesn't do much else that I recall...it's just an aid/reminder to get the issue in the comment. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [

Re: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion repository

2009-02-12 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Dennis Lundberg wrote: I would like to start using bugtraq [1] in our subversion repositories. If we set a bunch of svn properties in the repository, then version control tools can link to issues in JIRA. +1. Will it automatically parse [MNG-] or does a committer need to take special ste

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.0

2009-02-12 Thread Oleg Gusakov
Dennis Lundberg wrote: If it's possible I'd like to continue this release with the artifacts that were already built. I've been through hell and back already trying to get this release out the door. This is an interesting remark. I felt exactly the same until I tried Nexus process. Before -

RE: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.0

2009-02-12 Thread Brian E. Fox
It must replace the old process because we can't accurately sync to central the same artifacts from two places. The metadata will get hosed. Go ahead with the vote, and then I'll do the promotion via Nexus for you. -Original Message- From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] Sent:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.0

2009-02-12 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Sorry, but I haven't followed the threads about the Nexus repo as much as would have liked. Are you saying that it has completely replaced the old file based release repo at ASF? And that the only way to release an ASF artifact is through the Nexus instance? If it's possible I'd like to continue t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion repository

2009-02-12 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi Brian bugtrac works the other way round. It created links to JIRA from your version control tool. This will only happen for tools that support bugtraq, so it's not an enforcement tool. For clients that don't support bugtraq it makes no difference. The only thing that is changed in the svn repo

Re: Maven 2.x and 3 build comparisons

2009-02-12 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Might not the "help:effective-pom" plugin/goal be used to validate some of these automatically? Especially if there remains a canonical form for the pom. As long as this (or another) plugin can get logically equivalent, you can use xquery or xpath statements to validate that what appears

Re: Maven 2.x and 3 build comparisons

2009-02-12 Thread Stephen Connolly
Or, if you have a windows box, use WinMerge with the 7zip add-in It will allow easy comparison of war, jar and ear files... and you can dive down to see if the class files are the same (even if the date stamps are different) -Stephen 2009/2/12 Jason van Zyl : > > On 12-Feb-09, at 8:49 AM, Paul B

Re: Maven 2.x and 3 build comparisons

2009-02-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 12-Feb-09, at 8:49 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: Oleg, thank you for volunteering. j/k My only concern is that building a project successfully does not guarantee backwards compatibility. Things like property resolution, etc. need to either be eye balled or loaded into an application to show it w

Re: Maven 2.x and 3 build comparisons

2009-02-12 Thread Paul Benedict
Oleg, thank you for volunteering. j/k My only concern is that building a project successfully does not guarantee backwards compatibility. Things like property resolution, etc. need to either be eye balled or loaded into an application to show it works or bombs. Binaries, sure, maybe that's overki

Re: [vote] release maven 2.0.10

2009-02-12 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Works fine on the company builds. S. Brian E. Fox wrote: > >> It's finally time after 8 Release Candidates: >> >> >> Issues fixed: >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14112&styleName >> =Html&projectId=10500&Create=Create >> >> >> NOTE: The urls below are using a se

Re: Map @parameter loading problem

2009-02-12 Thread Costin Caraivan
Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > > Costin Caraivan wrote: > >> The invocation is from the pom.xml, inside a profile. So execution bound >> to >> a build lifecycle. > > Then consider to drop an example project in JIRA so we can have closer > look and something to reproduce the issue. From the few bi