Re: [vote] release mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4

2009-02-02 Thread Georgy Bolyuba
Well, I was just trying to build maven trunk :) Nothing else. Georgy On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote: > Georgy Bolyuba wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am new here, so, might be missing something. I am trying to build >> maven from trunk and: >> >> > > I guess, I phrased my question i

Re: Issue with ArtifactHandler in reactor builds

2009-02-02 Thread Stuart McCulloch
2009/2/3 Jason Chaffee > I am having an issue on 2.0.9. Basicallly, I have a custom plugin that has > it's own packaging type and creates a file of it's own extension type. This > only happens if I run a reactor build. If run maven in that project, it > works correctly. For example, > > my-bun

Re: classified artifact resolution

2009-02-02 Thread Nick Pellow
You're right. the dependency artifacts are already transitive. e.g. the -X output shows: [DEBUG] [Clover] List of dependency artifacts after changes: [DEBUG] [Clover] Artifact [com.fidelity.shares:shares- domain:jar:clover:1.0-SNAPSHOT], scope = [compile] [DEBUG] [Clover] List of artifac

Re: classified artifact resolution

2009-02-02 Thread Brett Porter
The dependency artifacts should already be transitive. I'm not quite sure how you are seeing the results you are. Have you tracked the output of the swizzling process? Does -X show what is then fed into the compiler plugin in the forked lifecycle? - Brett On 03/02/2009, at 3:26 PM, Nick Pe

Re: classified artifact resolution

2009-02-02 Thread Nick Pellow
Will the filtering be applied to the artifacts resolved by the maven- compiler-plugin, and the maven-surefire-plugin? My understanding is that: 1) the maven-clover2-plugin creates a classified artifact with the - clover classifier. it also looks for -clover classified artifacts of project dep

Re: password encryption in 2.1.x trunk

2009-02-02 Thread Brett Porter
On 03/02/2009, at 1:24 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: Any reason not to use a new field in settings.xml? I think 2.1.x can be capable of updating the model version. Why introduce a bunch of new work for this? I'm just concerned that we make this exception here and suddenly we have multiple fil

Re: [vote] release mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4

2009-02-02 Thread Oleg Gusakov
Georgy Bolyuba wrote: Hi, I am new here, so, might be missing something. I am trying to build maven from trunk and: I guess, I phrased my question incorrectly: maven trunk depends on mercury 1.0.0-alpha-2, where did you get that error? Building what? Thanks, Oleg Missing: -- 1)

Re: classified artifact resolution

2009-02-02 Thread Brett Porter
You can't modify the resolution, but you can filter the artifacts it gets from the project. There are a few utility classes for that (you'll see them used in the dependency plugin, assembly plugin for example). - Brett On 03/02/2009, at 12:14 PM, Nick Pellow wrote: Thanks for the clarifi

Re: classified artifact resolution

2009-02-02 Thread Nick Pellow
Thanks for the clarification, Brett. What can the maven-clover2-plugin do to ensure that only classified artifacts are resolved if they are available? On 03/02/2009, at 9:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote: Yes, that's expected - artifacts with a particular classifier are considered different to ar

Re: [vote] release mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4

2009-02-02 Thread Oleg Gusakov
The mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4 has been deployed to the sync directory. It will show up in central as soon as sync is run - may be several hours. Where are you getting 1.0.0-alpha-4-SNAPSHOT? What are you building? Thanks, Oleg Georgy Bolyuba wrote: Hi, I am new here, so, might be missing somethi

RE: Issue with ArtifactHandler in reactor builds

2009-02-02 Thread Jason Chaffee
I am having an issue on 2.0.9. Basicallly, I have a custom plugin that has it's own packaging type and creates a file of it's own extension type. This only happens if I run a reactor build. If run maven in that project, it works correctly. For example, my-bundle will create artifactId-versi

Re: Precedence of direct dependencies with equal conflict id

2009-02-02 Thread david
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Brett Porter wrote: On 26/01/2009, at 12:17 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: It should be a validation error if we find duplicated entries. +1 when building a project. Probably not when encountered in the repository (but changing the first would reduce the impact over time). wi

Re: classified artifact resolution

2009-02-02 Thread Brett Porter
Yes, that's expected - artifacts with a particular classifier are considered different to artifacts with a different or no classifier. On 02/02/2009, at 5:44 PM, Nick Pellow wrote: Hi, The maven-clover2-plugin creates both a classified and a normal jar artifact for each sub-module it build

Re: Skinny War

2009-02-02 Thread Timothy Twelves
Hi, 1. You are correct - it is up to the ear plugin and the war plugin to package these dependencies correctly. 2. The purpose of having an "application" dependency would be to remove the need to specify every dependency within your ear pom and also remove the need to have an aggregation pom*.

Re: [vote] release mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4

2009-02-02 Thread Georgy Bolyuba
Hi, I am new here, so, might be missing something. I am trying to build maven from trunk and: Missing: -- 1) org.apache.maven.mercury:mercury-event:jar:1.0.0-alpha-4-SNAPSHOT So, I am kinda confused. Is it or is it not available (mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4)? Georgy On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:

RE: Skinny War

2009-02-02 Thread Timothy Reilly
I'm surprised no one has commented. Since it's an important issue in my work or anyone that packages ears I would think. I'll comment below. > 1. add a new scope called "application" that is exposed > as application dependencies Having a scope for these seems to be a better approach in my

Re: Beginner with Maven

2009-02-02 Thread Georgy Bolyuba
I guess runing "mvn clean -e" will give mor info. For starters, I think it is possible that he does not have a pom.xml in "C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator" folder. I assume he needs to change the current folder ("cd ") Georgy On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Roshan Gunoo wrote: > please c

Re: [vote] release mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4

2009-02-02 Thread Oleg Gusakov
+3 binding votes, I proceed moving mercury-1.0.0-alpha-4 to production Thanks, Oleg Oleg Gusakov wrote: This is iterative improvements release of Mercury. The major change: - timestamped artifacts can now have dependencies - a bug was fixed 1 issue fixed: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MERC

Re: Beginner with Maven

2009-02-02 Thread Roshan Gunoo
please check your firewall setting On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:50 PM, amrorabi wrote: > > Please, > I am a beginner with the Maven "apache-maven-2.0.9", and I installed it and > set the environment variables, > then I tried to run just the command "mvn clean" but on plugins jars are > downloaded as

Re: Building from source

2009-02-02 Thread Georgy Bolyuba
Did that, yeah. Thanks for the hint. Georgy On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: > Can you turn of the checksum checking? > > -Original Message- > From: Georgy Bolyuba [mailto:boly...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:39 AM > To: dev@maven.apache.org > Subjec

NPE in MapperUtil

2009-02-02 Thread jerome creignou
Hi, I'm trying to use file mappers inside a maven plugin with the file-management shared project. I've added a fileset definition in the plugin's configuration as follow : info.flex-mojos flex-compiler-mojo true 2.0M11-SNAPSHOT

Re: maven 3.0-alpha-2 tagged

2009-02-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
I ran into a snag deploying the binaries due to a change in one of the Apache machines. Everything is fine now but that's why I didn't deploy it. On 2-Feb-09, at 12:36 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: binaries available ? 2009/1/31 Jason van Zyl : Shane/Benjamin, Go ahead and roll your changes int

RE: releasing 2.0.10?

2009-02-02 Thread Brian E. Fox
That's the plan. -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:henri.go...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 11:09 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: releasing 2.0.10? 2009/2/2 Brian E. Fox : > Who knows. Maybe, maybe not depending on the timing and uptake of 3.x > Well i

Re: releasing 2.0.10?

2009-02-02 Thread Henri Gomez
2009/2/2 Brian E. Fox : > Who knows. Maybe, maybe not depending on the timing and uptake of 3.x > Well if 2.1.0 is quickly stable and you need to add more stuff, 2.2.0 could be a good idea. But 2.x.y should stop at some time when 3.0 will be available or users will be stuck by so many differents

RE: Building from source

2009-02-02 Thread Brian E. Fox
Can you turn of the checksum checking? -Original Message- From: Georgy Bolyuba [mailto:boly...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:39 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Building from source Hi, I am following this: http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-building-m2

Building from source

2009-02-02 Thread Georgy Bolyuba
Hi, I am following this: http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-building-m2.html. Checkout from trunk: >svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/trunk . Trying to build: >ant Result: BUILD FAILED D:\tests\maven\build.xml:82: Unable to resolve artifact: Mi

RE: releasing 2.0.10?

2009-02-02 Thread Brian E. Fox
Who knows. Maybe, maybe not depending on the timing and uptake of 3.x -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:henri.go...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:11 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: releasing 2.0.10? I agree. But no 2.2.x is planned ? 2009/2/2 Brian

Re: releasing 2.0.10?

2009-02-02 Thread Henri Gomez
I agree. But no 2.2.x is planned ? 2009/2/2 Brian E. Fox : > Yes, but hopefully 2.0.x is end of life with either 2.0.10 or 2.0.11 and > 2.1.x becomes the active line. > > -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:henri.go...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 3:36 AM > To:

Re: pde build with maven

2009-02-02 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Christopher, Although I can't help you with pde-maven-plugin (I remember some discussion here about retiring it, see [1]), I am working on another maven-based tool called Tycho that should be able to build Eclipse RCP applications. You can read more about Tycho goals and scope in [2] and RCP

RE: releasing 2.0.10?

2009-02-02 Thread Brian E. Fox
Yes, but hopefully 2.0.x is end of life with either 2.0.10 or 2.0.11 and 2.1.x becomes the active line. -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:henri.go...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 3:36 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: releasing 2.0.10? So there will be 2

RE: password encryption in 2.1.x trunk

2009-02-02 Thread Brian E. Fox
>Any reason not to use a new field in settings.xml? I think 2.1.x can >be capable of updating the model version. Why introduce a bunch of new work for this? Also, we wanted to make it work in 2.0.x if possible. Since it's completely optional to use, there should be little downside risk to porti

Plugin - Artifact.getFile() not set.

2009-02-02 Thread palinf
Hello, I try to get the artifact name in a home-made plugin. I use the code below based on the maven-install-plugin. I am expecting the plugin name to be set after the package phase but it is not the case. I probably did not get a concept, could you let me know if something obvious is missing ?

Re: password encryption in 2.1.x trunk

2009-02-02 Thread Brett Porter
On 28/01/2009, at 5:48 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote: After a long and interesting discussion last August (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Secured+Passwords ) and several meetings with users, I felt it's overdue to do the actual implementation. I massaged my old, vintage 2007 code and put i

pde build with maven

2009-02-02 Thread Christopher Klewes
Hi, i want to setup my rcp project with a maven build. so first i want to build succesfully the example from the pde-maven-plugin site. i started by downloading the following eclipse sdk and delta pack: - eclipse-3.4.1-delta-pack.zip - eclipse-RCP-SDK-3.4.1-win32.zip i read through the examples

Re: maven 3.0-alpha-2 tagged

2009-02-02 Thread Henri Gomez
binaries available ? 2009/1/31 Jason van Zyl : > Shane/Benjamin, > > Go ahead and roll your changes into trunk. > > The alpha-2 is tagged. No messages about the vote because of a problem with > the upgrade on people.apache.org which is preventing me from deploying. > > Thanks, > > Jason > > --

Re: releasing 2.0.10?

2009-02-02 Thread Henri Gomez
So there will be 2.0.x 2.1.x and 3.0 ? 2009/1/30 Brian E. Fox : > There's a new 2.1 cut from the 2.0.x branch that provides a space to put > features. We did this back in Aug/Sept but there's been little forward > progress, so a release should get it started. When we planned it out, > there wa

Re: Merging with XWiki and WikiModel

2009-02-02 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi there, On Jan 31, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi Jason, 2009/1/29 Jason van Zyl : Howdy, I've been looking at reporting in Maven 3.x and I've been following the work that Vincent Massol has been doing over at XWiki where he has made some attempts at melding Doxia, the XW