I don't think it's wise to EOL a product without a GA replacement.
It's true that because 2.1 is in milestone releases it is not usable
by many people in an "approved" managerial environment, but, to the
same token, it's not feature complete either.
Personally speaking, I definitely am eagerly awa
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (28 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
Since trunk is going to be 3.0-SNAPSHOT in between alphas, I needed to
take a slightly different approach. In that case (,3.0-alpha-1) will
still trigger it, but [3.0-alpha-2,) will not (for those issues that
are later fixed).
What I did was changed the IT base class to ignore -SNAPSHOT - i
On 28/01/2009, at 9:03 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Normally I would agree on the late change, but it's entirely optional
usage so it wouldn't affect existing builds and I'd like to start
thinking about 2.0.10 being the EOL for 2.0.x.
Given there's already been a good number of fixes for 2.0.11 th
I was wondering: why isn't the negation operator part of the version
range syntax anyways?
It's just a matter of keeping the syntax simple - it doesn't add
functionality since you can express the same with alternate range
boundries.
Agreed. And there's something else: what would an expressio
On 30/01/2009, at 5:14 AM, Torben S. Giesselmann wrote:
Heya,
I just submitted a patch which allows using the artifact version
range syntax for activating profiles by JDK version. The
implementation remains compatible to the way it's currently done
(prefix matching), but now also allows
Thanks. Got it.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 30/01/2009, at 2:26 AM, sisb...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: sisbell
>> Date: Thu Jan 29 15:26:30 2009
>> New Revision: 738893
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=738893&view=rev
>>
>
>
> Hi Shane, I think you
On 30/01/2009, at 2:26 AM, sisb...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sisbell
Date: Thu Jan 29 15:26:30 2009
New Revision: 738893
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=738893&view=rev
Hi Shane, I think you forgot the 'branches' part of the URL when this
was created - can you move it over please?
I changed the crontab, the sync was not having place
cd $HOME/bin/synchronize/synchronize-inbound
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:25 PM, wrote:
> Author: brianf
> Date: Tue Jan 27 02:25:34 2009
> New Revision: 737976
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=737976&view=rev
> Log:
> pull inbound syn
Heya,
I just submitted a patch which allows using the artifact version range
syntax for activating profiles by JDK version. The implementation
remains compatible to the way it's currently done (prefix matching), but
now also allows using the negation operator "!" in conjunction with
version r
The range should simply skip 3.0alpha1 and 2
--Brian (mobile)
On Jan 29, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Arnaud HERITIER
wrote:
What i understand in brett's email is that its patches are for 2.1
branch
but he would like to add ITs to check those fixes in 2.1. His
question seems
to be if he has to
11 matches
Mail list logo
