What i understand in brett's email is that its patches are for 2.1 branch
but he would like to add ITs to check those fixes in 2.1. His question seems
to be if he has to activate those ITs for 3.0 also ?
Personnaly I would say yes but perhaps not now if you are preparing an
alpha2. Perhaps it can b
On 28-Jan-09, at 6:28 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I'm just committing a bunch of fixes. Each has the corresponding
integration test, but since some were in profiles, for example, I
haven't attempted to merge anything to trunk.
Please don't push anything to trunk, I'll pull in anything
Based on Benjamin's recommendation in MNG-3760, I've added this to
2.1.x.
Benjamin - I used 'project.baseUri' instead - since the project
namespace has no risk of clashing with a previous property (and it
doesn't affect actual model - it just limits ability to add a baseUri
field to the m
Hi,
I'm just committing a bunch of fixes. Each has the corresponding
integration test, but since some were in profiles, for example, I
haven't attempted to merge anything to trunk.
Any opinions on how to set the version in the IT? Should it stop at
2.99.99 and come back to check later, or
We actually have the start of a proposal regarding the metadata for
this. I will follow up shortly with the details.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:31 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: reposit
2009/1/28 nicolas de loof :
> with mirrorOf * I just can't have distinct mirror for releases and
> snapshots, and URL don't change so often !
> How can we expect people to be consistent as there is no place to define the
> official ID of a repo ? Mojo itself uses "Codehaus Snapshots" in site docs
>
with mirrorOf * I just can't have distinct mirror for releases and
snapshots, and URL don't change so often !
How can we expect people to be consistent as there is no place to define the
official ID of a repo ? Mojo itself uses "Codehaus Snapshots" in site docs
and "codehaus-shapshot" on wiki :-/
This is a manifest of people not being consistent, but just use mirrorOf
* to catch them. I don't see url being a whole lot easier because then
if the url changes, you're back in the same game.
-Original Message-
From: nicolas.del...@gmail.com [mailto:nicolas.del...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of
Hi,
The settings.xml element uses repository ID to match mirrors from
projetcs . Just to match codehaus shapshot repository, I have
to declare
snapshot.codehaus,codehaus.shapshot,codehaus-shapshot,Codehaus
Snapshots
... and maybe I still miss some variants
Why do we use ID to match repos, and no
