Jason van Zyl-5 wrote:
>
> This is a bad idea and don't count on Maven 3.x supporting this
> because it makes determining what the dependencies are black magic.
> The dependency tree and visualization tools won't work. In Maven 3.x
> we are likely to make the dependency set immutable post
Good point, I didn't consider things in a repo. We'll have to take the
last one in that case.
--Brian (mobile)
On Jan 26, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 26/01/2009, at 12:17 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
It should be a validation error if we find duplicated entries.
+1 when buildi
On 26/01/2009, at 12:17 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
It should be a validation error if we find duplicated entries.
+1 when building a project. Probably not when encountered in the
repository (but changing the first would reduce the impact over time).
- Brett
-Original Message-
Fro
Hi,
I am new to maven development and have been tackling the "skinny" war problem
(http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Solving+the+Skinny+Wars+problem).
After a few attempts and considering pros and cons of various solutions and
their implementations I am resigned to the fact that the o
The alpha-2 will be released when we get the last couple issues done.
As for the final release date, no idea yet.
On 26-Jan-09, at 12:53 PM, Tom Huybrechts wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Maarten Storm
wrote:
Yes it is a bad idea to add add dependencies programatically, I had a
RTF
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Maarten Storm wrote:
> Yes it is a bad idea to add add dependencies programatically, I had a
> RTFM thing :-( . The Pom must be the project model in all cases. Oeps
> and sorry for that. I fixed the issue by using the scope import stated
> somewhere in the conversa
Yes it is a bad idea to add add dependencies programatically, I had a
RTFM thing :-( . The Pom must be the project model in all cases. Oeps
and sorry for that. I fixed the issue by using the scope import stated
somewhere in the conversation. Maybe a stupid question when will Maven
3 be released?
K
+1
Hervé
Le samedi 24 janvier 2009, Oleg Gusakov a écrit :
> I feel I owe an explanation about what was going with the release. As we
> tried to refactor out jetty server code out of the transport provider,
> we hit a few bumps on the road. But with the help from Jetty community,
> who were kind
It should be a validation error if we find duplicated entries.
-Original Message-
From: Shane Isbell [mailto:shane.isb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 1:58 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Precedence of direct dependencies with equal conflict id
We can support this
We can support this behavior in 3.x.
PomTransformer.transformToModelProperties occurs before general inheritance.
We could put the rule in there to remove the first dependency before we
apply inheritance.
Shane
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote
Hi,
Shane and I found some other oddity. Consider this POM snippet extracted
from [0] that declares two direct dependencies on commons-collection but
with different versions:
commons-collections
commons-collections
2.0
commons-collections
common
This is a bad idea and don't count on Maven 3.x supporting this
because it makes determining what the dependencies are black magic.
The dependency tree and visualization tools won't work. In Maven 3.x
we are likely to make the dependency set immutable post resolution
phase.
I don't feel t
+1
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:jdca...@commonjava.org]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 11:25 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] release mercury-1.0.0-alpha-3
+1
Oleg Gusakov wrote:
> I feel I owe an explanation about what was going with the release. As we
>
+1
Oleg Gusakov wrote:
I feel I owe an explanation about what was going with the release. As we
tried to refactor out jetty server code out of the transport provider,
we hit a few bumps on the road. But with the help from Jetty community,
who were kind enough to fix it and release jetty 6.1.15
Maarten Storm-2 wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> I would like to add programmatically dependencies to the MavenProject.
> I have looked in the mail archives but I could not find info on this
> topic.Is there a possible solution for this?
> Kind regards,
> Maarten Storm
>
Hello,
I'm also interested by t
15 matches
Mail list logo