Re: [VOTE] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-3, maven-archiver 2.4, maven-common-artifact-filters 1.1

2008-12-21 Thread Paul Benedict
+1 for all. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-3, maven-archiver 2.4, maven-common-artifact-filters 1.1

2008-12-21 Thread Brett Porter
I believe the vote passed, so I would release as is and revisit for a 2.2 after a short soak period rather than starting over now. - Brett On 22/12/2008, at 2:55 PM, John Casey wrote: I don't *think* there are any regressions in there. They were my highest priority. I'm alright with re-rele

Re: [VOTE] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-3, maven-archiver 2.4, maven-common-artifact-filters 1.1

2008-12-21 Thread John Casey
I don't *think* there are any regressions in there. They were my highest priority. I'm alright with re-releasing this as 2.2, actually. It's working pretty well for me. Do we need to re-vote this, or is this vote result good enough? -john Brett Porter wrote: +1 (x3) And it finally got rid o

Release of Maven 3.0-alpha-1

2008-12-21 Thread Jason van Zyl
Aside from one problem I've found I'm ready to release 3.0-alpha-1. I'm going to let it bake for a while, work on testing, CI, m2e bootstrapping tools, and documentation. I plan to release it January 5th. I'm going into coding hibernation and generally off until after the holidays so I'll a

Re: [VOTE] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-3, maven-archiver 2.4, maven-common-artifact-filters 1.1

2008-12-21 Thread Brett Porter
+1 (x3) And it finally got rid of the "lone zero block" warning. John, are any of the remaining 32 scheduled issues for 2.2 regressions? If not, I'd like to suggest we give this a short soak period and then release 2.2. This seems like a high quality release to me. Cheers, Brett On 18/1

Re: [jira] Created: (MNG-3934) Get Nexus Pro building with Maven 3.x

2008-12-21 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 21-Dec-08, at 8:17 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Jason, I'd rather we didn't have tasks in JIRA that most developers can't do anything about (and aren't descriptive of the actual problem - it makes for non-sensical release notes in the long run). Too bad. It helps me keep track. I'll dele

Re: [jira] Created: (MNG-3934) Get Nexus Pro building with Maven 3.x

2008-12-21 Thread Brett Porter
Jason, I'd rather we didn't have tasks in JIRA that most developers can't do anything about (and aren't descriptive of the actual problem - it makes for non-sensical release notes in the long run). Is this a duplicate of MNG-3927? Thanks, Brett On 22/12/2008, at 12:11 PM, Jason van Zyl (J

Re: Alternative to mojo-executor but with more control?

2008-12-21 Thread Brett Porter
I'd suggest one of 3 things: - suggest an enhancement to the mojo executor to allow you to do this - write your own, use the maven-invoker to run the instances of release:prepare / perform / clean - write your own, using the underlying release libraries (you'll notice the release plugins are m