Re: [vote] Release maven-parent 10

You're right, sorry, I forgot. My daughter was born on tuesday. We didn't expect her before the end of the month. I'll finialize this release this week end. Arnaud On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > In the logic to relea

Re: What will replace the @aggregator MOJO configuration?

On 06/12/2008, at 9:37 AM, Brian Fox wrote: There's nothing presumptive about the fact that it HAS been deprecated in trunk for quite some time now. (since it was still called 2.1-snap) Ok, you're right, when binding to the lifecycle (which admittedly we are talking about here), though no

Re: What will replace the @aggregator MOJO configuration?

There's nothing presumptive about the fact that it HAS been deprecated in trunk for quite some time now. (since it was still called 2.1-snap) The aggregator is full of problems and usually leads to recursive builds when you bind it to the lifecycle. A complely new concept is needed to handl

Re: [vote] Release maven-parent 10

Arnaud HERITIER wrote: In the logic to release often I propose to release the version 10. This has passed, hasn't it? Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]